Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Human sensitivity to reinforcement in operant choice: How much do consequences matter?
S H Kollins1, M C Newland, T S Critchfield
1Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, kollish@fiona.umsmed.edu.
Human operant conditioning experiments may overestimate species differences in behavioral sensitivity. Methodological issues, not inherent species discontinuities, likely explain observed variations in reinforcement sensitivity between humans and nonhumans.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral science
- Comparative psychology
- Operant conditioning
Background:
- Human operant conditioning studies often suggest lower sensitivity to reinforcement consequences compared to nonhumans.
- This perceived difference implies species discontinuities in fundamental behavioral processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reanalyze existing data on human operant conditioning and reinforcement sensitivity.
- To investigate the validity of species discontinuity explanations for observed behavioral differences.
Main Methods:
- Reanalysis of 311 data sets from 25 studies.
- Studies utilized variable-interval schedules of reinforcement to assess sensitivity.
- Focus on human behavioral allocation among alternatives.
Main Results:
- Reanalysis confirmed that human behavioral allocation deviates from predictions based on programmed reinforcement rates.
- Close inspection revealed significant methodological issues in the original studies.
- These methodological factors heavily contributed to the observed human-nonhuman differences.
Conclusions:
- The observed differences in reinforcement sensitivity are largely attributable to methodological limitations, not species discontinuities.
- An explanation based on inherent species differences in basic behavioral processes is not supported by the evidence.
- Future research should address methodological rigor to accurately compare human and nonhuman operant behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Operant Conditioning
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Law of Effect
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
Primary and Secondary Reinforcers
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Reinforcement
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:

