Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"Others Decide for Us": Recommendations became restrictions in services for people with intellectual disability in Sweden.

Research in developmental disabilities·2026
Same author

Beyond Accuracy: Cognitive Speed in Speech-in-Noise Processing and Its Implications for the Ease of Language Understanding Model.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Cognitive Shifting Ability Does Not Predict Self-Perceived Hearing Difficulties in Adult Hearing-Aid Users.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

COVID-19 vaccination carries no association with childbirth rates in Sweden.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Spontaneous use of gestures during vocabulary testing in toddlers with cochlear implants.

Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology·2025
Same author

Neural correlates of form- and meaning-based predictability during speech perception.

Brain and cognition·2025
Same journal

Episodic and semantic memory contributions to imagination and creativity.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

What is the relationship between stress and prospective memory in everyday environments?

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Revisiting the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: a metacognitive perspective.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Beliefs about child witnesses: a survey of Danish legal professionals, social workers and psychologists.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Potto-biographical memory ≈ autobiographical memory: on the retrieval and organisation of fictional- and personal-event memories.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Conceptual and perceptual chunking of real-world objects in visual working memory.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Does retrieval strategy disruption cause general and specific collaborative inhibition?

Örjan Dahlström1, Henrik Danielsson, Magnus Emilsson

  • 1Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping, Sweden. orjan.dahlstrom@liu.se

Memory (Hove, England)
|February 19, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Collaborative memory experiments show that while groups recall fewer items than individuals, this "collaborative inhibition" isn't solely due to disrupted retrieval strategies. Forgetting non-overlapping items is a key factor in collaborative recall.

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Collaborative inhibition is a phenomenon where groups recall fewer items than the sum of individual recalls.
  • The retrieval strategy disruption (RSD) hypothesis suggests this inhibition occurs when collaborators interfere with each other's memory retrieval strategies.
  • Understanding the mechanisms behind collaborative inhibition is crucial for optimizing group memory performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether collaborative inhibition in memory recall is caused by the disruption of retrieval strategies within collaborating pairs.
  • To test the retrieval strategy disruption (RSD) hypothesis by manipulating the organization of word lists presented to participants.
  • To examine how using the same versus different retrieval strategies affects collaborative recall and inhibition.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty-six participants recalled a list of 60 words individually and collaboratively.
  • Word lists were organized by categories or country of origin to manipulate retrieval strategies.
  • The adjusted ratio of clustering score was used to assess the adoption of retrieval strategies.
  • Dyads were assigned to receive word lists organized by the same or different strategies.

Main Results:

  • A significant main effect of collaboration was found: collaborative recall was less than the sum of non-redundant individual recalls.
  • Both same-strategy and different-strategy dyads experienced similar levels of collaborative inhibition, not supporting the RSD hypothesis.
  • Dyads using different strategies forgot more non-overlapping items during collaboration compared to same-strategy dyads, aligning with the RSD prediction.
  • Collaborative forgetting primarily involves items recalled individually but not collaboratively (non-overlapping items).

Conclusions:

  • The retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis (RSD) is not fully supported as the sole explanation for collaborative inhibition.
  • Collaborative forgetting is significantly influenced by the loss of unique items recalled individually.
  • Future research should explore other factors contributing to collaborative inhibition beyond strategy disruption.