Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Determining Pain Detection and Tolerance Thresholds Using an Integrated, Multi-Modal Pain Task Battery
Published on: April 14, 2016
Assessment of acute pain in children: development of evidence-based guidelines
Ceilidh Stapelkamp1, Bernie Carter, Jenny Gordon
1ceilidh.stapelkamp@gmail.com
Insights
This study updates guidelines for assessing children's pain, recommending validated tools for various age groups and cognitive abilities. It emphasizes appropriate pain expression for effective recognition by healthcare providers.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Healthcare
- Pain Management
- Evidence-Based Practice
Background:
- Accurate assessment of children's pain is crucial for effective healthcare.
- Existing pain assessment guidelines require updating to reflect current evidence.
- Facilitating pain expression appropriate to cognitive development aids recognition by carers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To update evidence-based guidelines for assessing acute pain in children.
- To identify and recommend psychometrically sound pain assessment tools for diverse pediatric populations.
- To provide guidance for healthcare professionals on best practices for children's pain assessment.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of psychometric testing literature on pediatric pain assessment tools.
- Two-stage critical appraisal process based on relevance and quality criteria.
- Inclusion of tools based on established validity and reliability thresholds.
Main Results:
- Despite poor overall literature quality, 24 tools are recommended for infants and verbal children, with 11 being self-report.
- Eight tools are recommended for neonates, some requiring physiological measures.
- Four tools are validated for children with cognitive impairment, all demonstrating reliability and validity.
Conclusions:
- User-friendly tables present recommended tools with key features, validated settings, and age groups.
- Guidelines include expert recommendations on pain assessment timing and triggers.
- Full guidelines and supporting materials are available on the Royal College of Nursing website.
Aim:
Detecting children's pain in a healthcare setting can be improved by facilitating pain expression in ways that are appropriate to the child's cognitive development and that can be recognised by their carers. To ensure up-to-date guidance on assessing pain in children, the Royal College of Nursing undertook an evidence-based update of pain assessment guidelines, initially published in 2000.
Methods:
Following systematic review of the psychometric testing literature, a two-stage critical appraisal process was developed to derive a list of robust tools that could be recommended for use in a variety of settings to assess the intensity of a child's acute pain. Studies were appraised on the basis of their relevance to this topic and according to prespecified quality criteria. Tools were assessed for inclusion in guideline recommendations according to minimum validity and reliability thresholds.
Results:
Overall the quality of literature was poor, limited by small samples, lack of control groups, unblinded raters and convenience sampling. Twenty-four tools are recommended for use with infants and verbal children without cognitive impairment, 11 of which are purely self-report tools. Eight tools are recommended for use with neonates, some of which require concurrent physiological measures. Four tools are considered valid for use in children with cognitive impairment. All of these tools had shown reliability and validity according to the criteria established for this review.
Conclusion:
The tools are presented in user-friendly tables that include a guide to their key features and the setting and age groups in which they have been validated. They are accompanied by good practice recommendations from experts and recommendations relating to timing and triggers for pain assessment. These outputs are some of those associated with the full guidelines and supporting material published on the Royal College of Nursing website (http://www.rcn.org.uk/childrenspainguideline).
Related Concept Videos
Analgesia and Pain Management
Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.