Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Design Example01:23

Design Example

The innovation of touch-tone telephony revolutionized the telecommunications industry by replacing the traditional rotary dial with a dual-tone multi-frequency (DTMF) signaling system. This system uses a matrix-style keypad with buttons arranged in four rows and three columns, creating 12 distinct signals each assigned to a pair of frequencies. Each button press results in a simultaneous generation of two sinusoidal tones – one from a low-frequency group (697 to 941 Hz) and one from a...
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Design Consideration01:22

Design Consideration

Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key aspect...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prevalence and correlates of prior experimentation with e-cigarettes over conventional cigarettes among adolescents: Findings from the 2015 Korea Youth Risk Behaviour Web-based Survey.

Tobacco prevention & cessation·2020
Same author

Complex systems, evolution, and animal models.

Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences·2012
Same author

Why test animals to treat humans? On the validity of animal models.

Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences·2010
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Fairness in technological design.

Cameron Shelley1

  • 1Centre for Society, Technology, and Values, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada. cam_shelley@yahoo.ca

Science and Engineering Ethics
|February 22, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a visual method using the Taylor-Russell diagram to analyze fairness in technological design. It reveals how design choices create trade-offs between different groups, impacting distributive justice.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Technology and Society
  • Ethics in Design
  • Distributive Justice

Background:

  • Technological advancements increasingly raise complex ethical questions regarding fairness.
  • Assessing the fairness implications of design choices is crucial for equitable societal impact.
  • Existing frameworks may not adequately capture the trade-offs inherent in technology design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a visual, graphical methodology for analyzing the implications of technological design on fairness.
  • To provide a framework for identifying and exploring how design predictions can create conflicts between different stakeholder interests.
  • To examine the appropriateness of trade-offs in design configurations concerning fairness and distributive justice.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing the Taylor-Russell diagram as a central visual and graphical tool.
  • Analyzing a diverse range of case studies including surveillance, automotive safety, civic information, and international food distribution systems.
  • Applying the methodology to identify and clarify fairness issues within specific technological designs.

Main Results:

  • The Taylor-Russell diagram effectively illustrates how design configurations represent trade-offs between the interests of various constituencies.
  • Analysis of diverse examples demonstrates the methodology's applicability across different domains of technology design.
  • The methodology highlights that design choices can inherently pit the interests of different groups against one another.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed methodology offers a valuable tool for identifying and clarifying fairness issues in technology design.
  • While effective for analysis, the methodology does not constitute a general theory of fairness.
  • Achieving fair solutions requires integrating this methodology with additional ethical principles and concepts.