Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
Sample Proportion and Population Proportion01:20

Sample Proportion and Population Proportion

Collecting samples or responses from an entire population takes significant time and effort, so a researcher collects responses from only a sample of that population. Suppose a study needs to collect information about a specific mobile application. After sample collection, the researcher analyzes the data and discovers that most individuals in the sample use that specific mobile application. The sample proportion measures the number of individuals in a sample who either use or don't use the...
The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes02:45

The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes

In most organisms, sex is determined by the ratio of X and Y chromosomes. However, in some organisms, such as Drosophila and C.elegans, sex is determined by the ratio of the number of X chromosomes to the number of sets of autosomes. The Y chromosome in Drosophila is active but does not determine sex. It contains genes responsible for the production of sperms in adult flies.  
Normal male Drosophila has a ratio of one X chromosome to two sets of autosomes. In contrast, normal female Drosophila...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Then a miracle occurs: cause, effect, and the heterogeneity of criminal justice research.

Journal of experimental criminology·2025
Same author

Assessing Variability in Offending Between Sex and Non-Sex Offenders Through Age 70.

Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH·2025
Same author

Chronic Offending and Its Relation to Homicide in a Large, Prospective Brazilian Birth Cohort.

Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH·2025
Same author

Gun Violence Trends in US Cities During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Firearm Homicide Demographics Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.

JAMA network open·2024
Same author

PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of parent-engagement programs to reduce truancy and juvenile delinquency: A systematic review.

Campbell systematic reviews·2023
Same journal

Universal Reach at Birth: Family Connects.

The Future of children·2024
Same journal

Evolving Roles for Health Care in Supporting Healthy Child Development.

The Future of children·2021
Same journal

The Role of the Family and Family-Centered Programs and Policies.

The Future of children·2019
Same journal

Child Health and Access to Medical Care.

The Future of children·2016
Same journal

The Growing Racial and Ethnic Divide in U.S. Marriage Patterns.

The Future of children·2016
Same journal

Cohabitation and Child Wellbeing.

The Future of children·2016
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Disproportionate minority contact.

Alex R Piquero1

  • 1University of Maryland-College Park, USA.

The Future of Children
|February 23, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Racial disparities in the U.S. juvenile justice system are significant. Research should explore both differential involvement and selection, focusing on police contacts and evaluating interventions to address these systemic issues.

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
09:55

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology

Published on: September 28, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
09:55

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology

Published on: September 28, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Criminology and Criminal Justice
  • Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
  • Public Policy and Social Justice

Background:

  • Youth of color are disproportionately represented at all stages of the U.S. juvenile justice system.
  • The causes of these racial disparities are complex, debated as either differential involvement (offending rates) or differential selection (systemic treatment).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To move beyond the debate of differential involvement versus differential selection in juvenile justice.
  • To understand how both factors contribute to minority overrepresentation and inform effective interventions.
  • To identify critical research gaps, particularly concerning police-juvenile contacts and the evaluation of disparity-reduction initiatives.

Main Methods:

  • The abstract suggests a shift in research focus rather than detailing specific empirical methods.
  • Emphasis on analyzing police-juvenile interactions as a critical, understudied stage.
  • Call for empirical evaluation of existing initiatives aimed at reducing racial and ethnic disparities.

Main Results:

  • Current understanding of racial disparities in the juvenile justice system is insufficient.
  • The debate over differential involvement versus differential selection alone is not a helpful framework for future research.
  • Significant research gaps exist, especially regarding police discretion and the impact of disparities on long-term life outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Future research must integrate both differential involvement and selection hypotheses to explain and address juvenile justice disparities.
  • Focusing on police contacts and evaluating interventions are crucial next steps.
  • Updating data systems to reflect demographic changes is essential for accurate analysis and policy development.