Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Surgical Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Treated by Exosome-laden Collagen Patch and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Published on: September 15, 2023
Myocardial perfusion imaging after coronary artery bypass surgery using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a
J Ranjit Arnold1, Jane M Francis, Theodoros D Karamitsos
1University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Insights
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion quantification is accurate in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients. Model-independent deconvolution accurately measures myocardial blood flow in graft-supplied territories, avoiding underestimation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular imaging
- Medical physics
- Cardiac surgery
Background:
- Absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has not been applied in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients.
- Contrast bolus dispersion in bypass grafts may lead to underestimation of MBF.
- Resting MBF in noncritically stenosed territories (<85%) can reveal systematic quantification errors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test if absolute CMR perfusion quantification systematically underestimates MBF in segments supplied by bypass grafts.
- To validate a method for assessing myocardial perfusion in CABG patients.
Main Methods:
- 28 patients undergoing elective CABG were studied using 1.5 T CMR.
- Resting MBF was evaluated using model-independent deconvolution.
- Analyses compared MBF in grafted and ungrafted segments subtended by noncritically stenosed native arteries (<85%) before and after revascularization.
Main Results:
- A total of 249 segments with <85% stenosis were analyzed.
- After revascularization, no significant difference in MBF was found between ungrafted (0.82±0.19 mL/min/g) and grafted segments (0.82±0.15 mL/min/g).
- MBF in graft-subtended segments did not significantly change from baseline after revascularization (0.86±0.20 mL/min/g).
Conclusions:
- Model-independent deconvolution analysis does not systematically underestimate blood flow in graft-subtended territories.
- This methodology is justified for evaluating myocardial perfusion in CABG patients.
Background:
Absolute quantification of perfusion with cardiovascular magnetic resonance has not previously been applied in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Owing to increased contrast bolus dispersion due to the greater distance of travel through a bypass graft, this approach may result in systematic underestimation of myocardial blood flow (MBF). As resting MBF remains normal in segments supplied by noncritical coronary stenosis (<85%), measurement of perfusion in such territories may be utilized to reveal systematic error in the quantification of MBF. The objective of this study was to test whether absolute quantification of perfusion with cardiovascular magnetic resonance systematically underestimates MBF in segments subtended by bypass grafts.
Methods And Results:
The study population comprised 28 patients undergoing elective CABG for treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. Eligible patients had angiographic evidence of at least 1 myocardial segment subtended by a noncritically stenosed coronary artery (<85%). Subjects were studied at 1.5 T, with evaluation of resting MBF using model-independent deconvolution. Analyses were confined to myocardial segments subtended by native coronary arteries with <85% stenosis at baseline, and MBF was compared in grafted and ungrafted segments before and after revascularization. A total of 249 segments were subtended by coronary arteries with <85% stenosis at baseline. After revascularization, there was no significant difference in MBF in ungrafted (0.82±0.19 mL/min/g) versus grafted segments (0.82±0.15 mL/min/g, P=0.57). In the latter, MBF after revascularization did not change significantly from baseline (0.86±0.20 mL/min/g, P=0.82).
Conclusions:
Model-independent deconvolution analysis does not systematically underestimate blood flow in graft-subtended territories, justifying the use of this methodology to evaluate myocardial perfusion in patients with CABG.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
