Related Experiment Videos
Regulation of enzymes that detoxify the electrophilic forms of chemical carcinogens
P Talalay1, H J Prochaska, S R Spencer
1Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.
Abstract:
Most chemical carcinogens require activation to reactive electrophilic forms by Phase 1 enzymes (cytochromes P-450) in order to exert their toxic and neoplastic effects. The resultant electrophiles are susceptible to metabolic conjugation and other types of detoxications by Phase 2 enzymes (glutathione transferases, NAD(P)H: quinone reductase, glucuronosyltransferases). The balance between Phase 1 and Phase 2 enzymes is an important determinant of whether exposure to carcinogens will result in toxicity and neoplasia. Measurements of the activity of quinone reductase (QR) provide an efficient method for studying the potency and mechanism of Phase 2 enzyme induction. QR can be measured easily in murine hepatoma cells (Hepa lclc7) grown in microtiter plate wells, and the inductive response of these cells closely parallels the behavior of rodent tissues in vivo. Some inducers (such as large planar aromatics) are bifunctional; they induce both Phase 1 and Phase 2 enzymes and require binding to the Ah receptor and enhanced transcription of the cytochrome P1-450 system. Other inducers (e.g., phenolic antioxidants, 1, 2-dithiole-3-thiones, coumarins, thiocarbamates) are monofunctional and are independent of Ah receptor function. Monofunctional enzyme induction protects against carcinogens. The induction of Phase 2 enzymes by monofunctional inducers depends on the presence, or acquisition by metabolism, of electrophilic centers, and many of these inducers are Michael reaction acceptors. Our search for chemoprotective enzyme inducers for potential use as chemoprotectors in man is currently focused on fumarate derivatives, as well as on the identification of other monofunctional inducers in extracts of vegetables.
Insights
Understanding the balance between Phase 1 and Phase 2 enzymes is crucial for determining cancer risk from chemical carcinogens. This study highlights how Phase 2 enzyme induction, particularly quinone reductase (QR), can be measured to identify effective chemoprotective agents.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Toxicology
- Enzymology
Background:
- Chemical carcinogens often require metabolic activation by Phase 1 enzymes (cytochromes P-450) to become toxic.
- Phase 2 enzymes, such as glutathione transferases and NAD(P)H: quinone reductase (QR), detoxify these reactive intermediates.
- The balance between Phase 1 and Phase 2 enzyme activity is critical in modulating carcinogen toxicity and neoplasia.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of Phase 2 enzyme induction in chemoprotection against carcinogens.
- To establish a reliable method for assessing the potency and mechanism of Phase 2 enzyme inducers.
- To identify novel monofunctional enzyme inducers for potential chemoprotective applications in humans.
Main Methods:
- Utilized murine hepatoma cells (Hepa 1clc7) in microtiter plate assays to measure quinone reductase (QR) activity.
- Compared the inductive responses in cell cultures with known responses in rodent tissues in vivo.
- Differentiated between bifunctional inducers (Ah receptor-dependent) and monofunctional inducers (Ah receptor-independent).
Main Results:
- QR activity measurements in Hepa 1clc7 cells effectively reflect Phase 2 enzyme induction potency and mechanism.
- Monofunctional enzyme inducers, which are often Michael reaction acceptors, demonstrate chemoprotective capabilities.
- Ah receptor-independent inducers are key targets for developing chemoprotective strategies.
Conclusions:
- Measuring QR induction in cell-based assays is a valuable tool for studying Phase 2 enzyme modulation.
- Monofunctional inducers represent a promising class of chemoprotective agents.
- Further research into fumarate derivatives and vegetable extracts may yield new chemoprotectors.