Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) primarily center around electronically documenting patients' health information within a single healthcare organization or practice. They contain essential clinical data related to a patient's medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, lab results, and other pertinent information relevant to the specific encounter or episode of care. EMRs are designed to streamline documentation and workflow processes within individual healthcare settings,...

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

The guidelines and strategies provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) offer essential principles for ensuring safe and secure computer charting systems in healthcare settings. Let's break down each recommendation:
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:

Data Reporting and Recording

Data Reporting and Recording

Reporting and recording are crucial in data documentation. The timely, thorough, and accurate documentation of facts is essential when recording patient data. Failure to record findings during an assessment or interpretation of a problem will result in loss of information and make the patient document unreliable. The reader is left with general impressions if the information is not specific. A recording is documenting data of the individual's health information in a traceable, secure, and...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Predictive models of adverse outcomes of overweight or obesity: a nationwide cohort validation.

BMC endocrine disorders·2026

Same author

Long-term outcomes and late effects of surgery and radiotherapy in adult intracranial ependymoma patients.

Journal of neuro-oncology·2026

Same author

Evaluation of robust central nervous system treatment planning on a compact, gantry-less proton therapy system.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026

Same author

Microbial Landscape of Bull (<i>Bos taurus</i>) Ejaculate: Assessment of Diversity and Link to Fertility.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2026

Same author

Safety and antitumour activity of ipatasertib combined with endocrine therapy and a CDK4/6 inhibitor in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (TAKTIC): a single-centre, open-label, phase 1b trial.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026

Same author

AI-based detection of coronary artery calcium score in non-gated chest computed tomography of patients who decline statin therapy: A missed opportunity for prevention.

Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

A Weighty Problem: Identification, Characteristics and Risk Factors for Errors in EMR Data.

Saveli I Goldberg¹, Maria Shubina, Andrzej Niemierko

¹Massachusetts General Hospital.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium Proceedings. AMIA Symposium

|February 25, 2011

Summary

An algorithm accurately identifies errors in electronic medical record (EMR) weight data, finding errors in 0.58% of entries. This tool can improve the quality of vital patient information.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Medical Informatics
Data Quality Management

Background:

Electronic Medical Records (EMR) are crucial for healthcare decision support, research, and quality control.
Ensuring the accuracy of quantitative EMR data, such as patient weights, is vital but understudied.
Previous research highlighted inaccuracies in categorical EMR data, with limited information on quantitative data.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate an algorithm for identifying errors in electronic medical record (EMR) weight data.
To assess the prevalence and patterns of errors in a large dataset of EMR weight entries.
To investigate factors influencing the likelihood of data entry errors.

Main Methods:

A novel algorithm was designed to detect inaccuracies in quantitative EMR weight data.
The algorithm's performance was evaluated, achieving a precision of 98.9%.
The algorithm was applied to analyze 420,469 weight records from 25,000 patients.

Main Results:

The algorithm identified errors in 0.58% of all weight entries.
Approximately 7% of patients had at least one erroneous weight record.
Individuals with prior errors were nearly twice as likely to make future errors; physicians made fewer errors than non-physicians.

Conclusions:

A precise algorithm for identifying errors in EMR weight data has been developed.
User error patterns indicate that prior mistakes and user type (physician vs. non-physician) influence accuracy.
Rapid error detection can significantly enhance the quality and reliability of EMR weight data.