Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods01:20

Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods

Pharmacodynamic methods provide insights into a drug's effects on physiological processes over time and play a crucial role in understanding bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy. These methods can be broadly classified into acute pharmacological and therapeutic response approaches, each with distinct mechanisms and applications.The acute pharmacological response method directly correlates a drug's physiological effects, such as ECG or pupil diameter changes, to its time course in the body.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-sebaceous lymphadenoma of the salivary gland: case report with immunohistochemical investigation.

Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology·2007
Same author

[Enhancement of HSP-MUC1 antitumor activity by type C CpG-ODN BW005].

Xi bao yu fen zi mian yi xue za zhi = Chinese journal of cellular and molecular immunology·2007
Same author

Inhibition of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus infection by equine neutralizing antibody in golden Syrian hamsters.

Viral immunology·2007
Same author

Synergistic effect between components of mixtures of cationic amphipaths in transfection of primary endothelial cells.

Molecular pharmaceutics·2007
Same author

The insertion polymorphism in angiotensin-converting enzyme gene associated with the APOE epsilon 4 allele increases the risk of late-onset Alzheimer disease.

Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN·2007
Same author

[Study on the analysis of mixed spectra of benzene homologs with Dolittle multivariate correction method].

Guang pu xue yu guang pu fen xi = Guang pu·2007
Same journal

Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Treatment Regimens for Resistant Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
Same journal

Evidence Map Analysis on Randomized Controlled Trials: Chinese Patent Medicines and Classic Traditional Chinese Medicine Prescriptions.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
Same journal

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
Same journal

Dual Targeted Therapy for Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
Same journal

Prognostic Value of the TyG Index and CHG Index in Gastric Cancer.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
Same journal

A Large Language Model Pipeline for Stroke Staging Using Electronical Medical Records.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Methodological issues in cost-effectiveness studies: a brief overview.

Xin Sun1, Li Wang, Youping Li

  • 1Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. sunyzmy@hotmail.com

Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
|February 26, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cost-effectiveness studies require careful design and interpretation. Methodological choices in costing, measurement, and modeling impact results

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is crucial for healthcare decision-making.
  • Ensuring the validity and transferability of CEA results is essential for reliable evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and discuss key methodological challenges affecting the validity and transferability of cost-effectiveness studies.
  • To highlight potential threats to the reliability of economic evaluations in healthcare.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of methodological issues in economic analysis.
  • Identification of factors influencing validity (costing, utility measurement, economic modeling).
  • Identification of factors influencing transferability (health systems, clinical practice, resource use, unit prices, study design).

Main Results:

  • Validity of cost-effectiveness studies can be compromised by choices in costing, health utility measurement, and economic modeling.
  • Transferability of results is influenced by variations in healthcare systems, clinical practices, resource use, and unit prices.
  • Limitations in study design, such as piggybacked designs, can also impact transferability.

Conclusions:

  • Caution is necessary when designing, conducting, and interpreting cost-effectiveness studies.
  • Addressing validity and transferability issues is critical for the appropriate application of economic evaluation findings.
  • Improved methodological rigor can enhance the utility of cost-effectiveness evidence in healthcare policy.