Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Outcomes and associated risk factors for mitral valve replacement in children
Bahaaldin Alsoufi1, Cedric Manlhiot, Mamdouh Al-Ahmadi
1King Faisal Heart Institute, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. balsoufi@hotmail.com
Insights
Mitral valve replacement (MVR) in children has high rates of death and reoperation. Patient age, prosthesis size, and complications impact outcomes, with avoiding oversized prostheses potentially improving results for younger children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research
- Prosthetic Valve Performance
Background:
- Mitral valve replacement (MVR) is a critical intervention for pediatric heart conditions.
- Long-term outcomes and risk factors following MVR in children require detailed investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report time-related outcomes after MVR in a pediatric cohort.
- To identify patient-specific and surgical factors influencing mortality and reoperation rates.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of clinical records for 307 children undergoing MVR (1985-2004).
- Application of competing-risks methodology to analyze time-to-event data for death, mitral reoperation, and survival without reoperation.
- Identification of associated risk factors using statistical analysis.
Main Results:
- Twenty-year predicted rates: 17% mortality, 51% mitral reoperation, 33% alive and free from reoperation.
- Risk factors for death included younger age (<3 years), longer cross-clamp time, postoperative complications, and higher prosthesis size/BSA ratio.
- Risk factors for reoperation included homograft/tissue prosthesis and smaller prosthesis size.
Conclusions:
- High rates of mortality and mitral reoperation are observed post-MVR in children.
- Outcomes are predictable based on age, prosthesis size, and other factors.
- Optimizing prosthesis size, particularly in younger children, may improve long-term results.
Objective:
We aim to report time-related outcomes following mitral valve replacement (MVR) in children and to identify factors affecting outcomes.
Methods:
Clinical records from 307 children who underwent MVR between 1985 and 2004 were reviewed. Competing-risks methodology determined time-related prevalence of three mutually exclusive end-states: death, mitral reoperation and survival without subsequent MVR, and their associated risk factors.
Results:
Mean age was 11.4 ± 5.6 years including 36 (12%) patients < 2 years old. There were 154 (50%) males. Underlying pathology was rheumatic fever (n = 195, 64%), congenital (n = 83, 27%) and other (n = 29, 9%) with congenital pathology predominant in younger children while rheumatic fever predominant in older children. Hemodynamic manifestation was regurgitation (83%), stenosis (5%), or mixed disease (12%). One hundred and twenty-six patients (41%) had undergone a prior cardiac surgery including mitral surgery (n = 96, 31%). Initial mitral prosthesis was mechanical (n = 229, 75%), tissue (n = 71, 23%), or homograft (n = 7, 2%). Concomitant cardiac surgery was required in 141 patients (46%). Competing-risks analysis predicted that 20 years following MVR, approximately 17% of patients have died, 51% have undergone mitral reoperation and only 33% were alive and free from mitral reoperation. Risk factors for death without mitral reoperation included younger age < 3 years [PE (parameter estimates): +1.66 ± 0.31, p < 0.001], longer cross-clamp time (PE: +0.11 ± 0.04/10 min, p = 0.005), postoperative complications (PE: +1.5 8 ± 0.31, p < 0.001), and higher prosthesis size/body surface area (BSA)-predicted mitral annulus ratio (PE: + 0.48 ± 0.10, p < 0.001). Risk factors for mitral reoperation included implantation of homograft or tissue prosthesis (PE: +1.12 ± 0.23, p < 0.001) and smaller prosthesis size (PE: +0.06 ± 0.03/1 mm, p = 0.05). Fifteen-year freedom from pacemaker implantation, endocarditis, bleeding, and thromboembolism was 92%, 96%, 82%, and 92%, respectively.
Conclusions:
Mortality and mitral reoperation are common after MVR in children and outcomes can be predicted based on patient's age, prosthesis size, and other associated factors. Some modifiable factors such as avoiding oversized prostheses may improve outcomes especially in the smallest children.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction