Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

Group Design

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...

Case Studies

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.

Surveys

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.

Observational Studies

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...

Cross-Sectional Research

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Evaluating real-world mortality risk after defibrillator implantation.

The British journal of cardiology·2026

Same author

Protecting and promoting editorial independence - CORRIGENDUM.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2025

Same author

Long Term Survival Benefits of Different Conduits Used in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery- A Single Institutional Practice Over 20 Years.

Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare·2024

Same author

Protecting and promoting editorial independence.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2024

Same author

When is a diagnosis not a diagnosis?

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ·2023

Same author

Survival and Independent Predictors of Mortality Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in a Single-Unit Practice in the United Kingdom Over 20 Years.

Cureus·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of multiple mini-interviews and structured interviews in a UK setting.

Aileen O'Brien¹, Jake Harvey, Muriel Shannon

¹Department of Mental Health, St George's University of London, UK. aobrien@sgul.ac.uk

Medical Teacher

|March 2, 2011

Summary

The multiple mini-interview (MMI) is a reliable tool for selecting medical students in the UK. Both MBBS 4 and MBBS 5 applicants performed well, with MBBS 5 candidates showing improved scores.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Admissions Selection

Background:

The multiple mini-interview (MMI) is a validated tool for medical student selection.
UK medical training admissions traditionally use single interviews, lacking MMI evaluation.
Research has not yet assessed MMI effectiveness within the UK context.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability of the MMI in UK medical school admissions.
To compare MMI performance against traditional interview formats.
To explore MMI correlations with demographic factors and aptitude tests.

Main Methods:

Developed and piloted MMI stations for MBBS 4 and MBBS 5 admission candidates.
Compared MMI scores with traditional interview scores.
Analyzed relationships between MMI performance, demographics, and UK Clinical Aptitude Test/Graduate Medical School Admissions Test results.

Main Results:

MBBS 4 applicants performed comparably on MMI and traditional interviews.
MBBS 5 applicants demonstrated superior performance on the MMI.
No significant performance differences were observed based on sex or age.

Conclusions:

MMIs are reliable, feasible, and well-accepted by applicants and interviewers.
MMIs show promise as a valid method for assessing medical school candidates.
Further longitudinal research is recommended to confirm MMI predictive validity for future doctor success.