Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
Published on: June 21, 2019
A cost comparison of more and less nutritious food choices in US supermarkets
David L Katz1, Kim Doughty, Valentine Njike
1Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, Griffin Hospital, 130 Division Street, Derby, CT 06418, USA. katzdl@pol.net
Objective:
The present study directly compared prices of more and less nutritious foods within given categories in US supermarkets.
Design:
Foods selected from six supermarkets in Jackson County were categorized using the five criteria of the Nutrition Detectives™ (ND) programme and an item-to-item cost comparison was made using posted prices. The nutritional quality of foods was distinguished using the clues of the ND nutrition education programme for elementary-school children and validated using the Overall Nutritional Quality Index.
Setting:
Supermarkets in Jackson County, MO, USA.
Subjects:
Not applicable.
Results:
The average price of the item for more nutritious foods did not differ significantly from that of less nutritious foods overall ($US 2·89 (sd $US 0·74) v. $US 2·85 (sd $0·68), P = 0·76). More nutritious breads cost more than less nutritious breads ($US 3·36 (sd $ US 0·28) v. $US 2·56 (sd $US 0·80, P = 0·03), whereas more nutritious cereals ($US 2·46 (sd $US 0·69) v. $US 3·50 (sd $US 0·30), P < 0·01) and cookies ($US 2·76 (sd $US 0·50) v. $US 3·40 (sd $US0·28), P < 0·01) cost less.
Conclusions:
Our findings indicate that it is possible to choose more nutritious foods within many common categories without spending more money and suggest that making small improvements in dietary choices does not invariably cost more.
Related Concept Videos
Dietary Connections
Energy Balance
Optimal Foraging
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Sources of Food Contamination
Regulation of Food Intake
