Attenuated Abeta42 responses to low potency gamma-secretase modulators can be overcome for many pathogenic presenilin

Benedikt Kretner1, Akio Fukumori, Amelie Gutsmiedl

  • 1DZNE-German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Insights

Certain mutations in presenilin (PS) impact how effectively γ-secretase modulators (GSMs) lower amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) levels. Potent second-generation GSMs can overcome resistance seen with older compounds, offering new therapeutic avenues for Alzheimer disease.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology
  • Drug Discovery

Background:

  • Alzheimer disease pathogenesis is linked to amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) production via β- and γ-secretase.
  • Selective reduction of pathogenic Aβ variants using γ-secretase modulators (GSMs) is a key therapeutic strategy.
  • Presenilin (PS) mutations, the catalytic core of γ-secretase, can influence Aβ production.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential responses of presenilin (PS) mutations to various γ-secretase modulators (GSMs).
  • To determine if potent second-generation GSMs can overcome resistance in PS mutants.
  • To identify key residues and spatial factors influencing GSM efficacy.

Main Methods:

  • Assessing the effect of NSAID-type and second-generation GSMs on Aβ(42) generation in cells expressing various PS mutations.
  • Comparing responses of homologous PS1 and PS2 mutations to GSM-1.
  • Identifying critical residues like Leu-166 in PS1 through mutation analysis.

Main Results:

  • Many pathogenic PS mutations showed resistance to lowering Aβ(42) by NSAID-type GSMs.
  • The potent GSM-1 effectively lowered Aβ(42) in many, but not all, PS mutants.
  • Homologous PS1 and PS2 mutations exhibited differential responses to GSM-1, indicating dependence on the γ-secretase microenvironment.
  • The PS1 L166P mutation was resistant to GSM-1, highlighting Leu-166's importance.
  • PS mutants responded similarly to various potent second-generation GSMs, regardless of structural class.

Conclusions:

  • The efficacy of GSMs in reducing Aβ(42) is dependent on both the specific PS mutation and the modulator used.
  • Potent second-generation GSMs can restore therapeutic efficacy for many PS mutants resistant to lower-potency compounds.
  • Understanding these differential responses is crucial for developing effective Alzheimer disease therapeutics targeting Aβ production.