Related Experiment Videos
Information about morality and behaviour of victims
Summary
Italian Law of Procedure (1988) restricts admitting evidence on victim morality, admitting only objective behavior. This law conflicts with protecting individual rights and prohibiting criminological examinations during trials, though witness credibility evaluation is crucial.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Psychology
- Legal Studies
- Criminology
Background:
- The Italian Law of Procedure (1988) governs the admissibility of evidence in criminal trials.
- Current legislation restricts evidence concerning the morality of the guilty, witnesses, and victims.
- Evidence about victims is admissible only when directly relevant to evaluating the criminal event and the victim's behavior.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the implications of the Italian Law of Procedure (1988) regarding victim evidence.
- To critique the admissibility of evidence based on 'moral qualities' versus 'objective behavior'.
- To examine the law's consistency with broader principles of individual rights and trial procedures.
Main Methods:
- Legal analysis of the Italian Law of Procedure (1988).
- Comparative review of legal principles concerning personal rights and trial conduct.
- Case example analysis (e.g., 'corruption of a minor') to illustrate the application of 'objective behavior'.
Main Results:
- The law's exclusion of victim morality evidence is deemed problematic, particularly when objective behavior is more relevant.
- The concept of 'generic moral qualities' lacks practical significance in legal evaluation.
- The law appears to contradict fundamental legal principles protecting individual rights and prohibiting criminological examinations during trials.
Conclusions:
- Admitting evidence of a victim's objective behavior, rather than subjective morality, is essential for a fair trial.
- The current law requires re-evaluation to align with the protection of personal rights and procedural fairness.
- Acquiring specific behavioral elements is crucial for assessing witness credibility without infringing on victim rights.