Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Manipulation and Analysis01:21

Manipulation and Analysis

GIS manipulation and analysis functions are vital for decision-making and planning. These activities range from data retrieval tasks, such as selecting information based on specific criteria, to advanced analytical techniques that address complex spatial problems.One critical GIS analysis method is overlaying, which combines multiple data layers to examine impacts. For example, overlaying a river-dammed lake boundary with road networks can identify affected infrastructure. Another common...
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human children, chimpanzees, and orangutans act rationally in an adaptive collaborative choice task.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

Individual Differences in Great Ape Cognition Across Time and Domains: Stability, Structure, and Predictability.

Psychological science·2026
Same author

ChildLens: An egocentric video dataset for activity analysis in children.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

EVApeCognition: An 18-Year Dataset of Great Ape Cognition.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Animal cumulative culture through changing environments.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

The social learning and development of intra- and inter-ethnic sharing norms in the Congo Basin.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Rank and payoff biases influence subject choices in a foraging task among sanctuary chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Buzzed but not elated? Effect of ethanol on cognitive judgement bias in honeybees.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Dogs tuned to conspecific vocalizations: behavioral evidence for a voice processing preference.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Variation in song structure does not predict associative learning performance in zebra finches (Taeniopygia castanotis) raised under controlled cultural conditions.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Executive functioning in wild guppies: investigating the impact of a pharmaceutical pollutant.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Performance of sheep and goats in a delay of gratification task.

Animal cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Assessing Spatial Learning and Memory in Small Squamate Reptiles
08:44

Assessing Spatial Learning and Memory in Small Squamate Reptiles

Published on: January 3, 2017

Great apes' strategies to map spatial relations.

Alenka Hribar1, Daniel Haun, Josep Call

  • 1Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany. hribar@eva.mpg.de

Animal Cognition
|March 2, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Great apes like chimpanzees and orangutans can understand spatial relationships but may rely on landmarks rather than direct spatial mapping for reasoning about similarity.

More Related Videos

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals
08:28

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals

Published on: November 6, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Assessing Spatial Learning and Memory in Small Squamate Reptiles
08:44

Assessing Spatial Learning and Memory in Small Squamate Reptiles

Published on: January 3, 2017

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals
08:28

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals

Published on: November 6, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Comparative Psychology
  • Primatology

Background:

  • Understanding spatial relational similarity is crucial for navigating and interacting with the environment.
  • Great apes (chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans) exhibit complex cognitive abilities, including spatial reasoning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how great apes reason about spatial relational similarity.
  • To determine if apes can map relative positions between two spatial arrays.

Main Methods:

  • Apes were tested on three spatial mapping tasks involving two arrays of cups.
  • The tasks required apes to identify a hidden reward based on its relative position in a sample array.
  • Array configurations varied across experiments, including linear, row, and misaligned arrangements.

Main Results:

  • Apes demonstrated an ability to compare spatial arrays and perceive similarity.
  • Evidence suggests apes did not consistently map identical relative positions (e.g., left-to-left).
  • Apes appeared to use environmental landmarks to infer spatial relationships.

Conclusions:

  • Great apes possess sophisticated spatial cognition but may employ flexible strategies.
  • Reliance on landmarks indicates a nuanced understanding of spatial relationships beyond simple direct mapping.
  • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms of spatial reasoning in apes.