Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-control: changing our perspective on performance.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Optimal diving: patch quality, depth, and marginal value.

Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology·2025
Same author

Optimal competitors: the balance of attraction and choices of mutualists, like pollinators, drives facilitation and may promote crop pollination.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Scales of risk and adaptive 'dread': an evolutionary theory of risk inflation.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

An exploration of the postural, location- and social contact- related sub-characteristics of inactive but awake behaviour as a depression-like indicator in mice.

Applied animal behaviour science·2025
Same author

Through Human Eyes: Owner Insights into the Social Relationships of Pet Rats.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Decision-making under uncertainty: biases and Bayesians.

Pete C Trimmer1, Alasdair I Houston, James A R Marshall

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol, UK. trimmer@compsci.bristol.ac.uk

Animal Cognition
|March 2, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Decision-making under uncertainty, especially ambiguity, is explored. Optimal probability estimates depend on their generation; Bayesian frameworks suggest unbiased estimates, potentially resolving the Ellsberg Paradox.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Decision Sciences
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Background:

  • Animals, including humans, frequently encounter situations with uncertain outcomes and ambiguous environmental cues.
  • Decision-making under risk and ambiguity is a fundamental challenge in understanding animal and human behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the theoretical aspects of decision-making under uncertainty, with a focus on ambiguity.
  • To examine the applicability of the Bayesian decision-maker paradigm to animals and humans.
  • To explore potential resolutions for the Ellsberg Paradox within a Bayesian framework.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical modeling of decision-making processes.
  • Review of experimental economics and psychology literature.
  • Analysis of the Ellsberg Paradox and its implications for Bayesian models.

Main Results:

  • The optimality of biasing probability estimates is contingent on the method of their generation.
  • Bayesian frameworks with appropriate priors indicate that unbiased probability estimates are optimal.
  • The Ellsberg Paradox, seemingly demonstrating ambiguity aversion, may be reconcilable with Bayesian principles.

Conclusions:

  • The Bayesian paradigm offers a robust framework for understanding decision-making under uncertainty.
  • Further investigation into the generation of probability estimates is crucial for resolving apparent deviations from optimal behavior, such as the Ellsberg Paradox.
  • The evolutionary basis of decision-making strategies can be better understood through the lens of Bayesian principles.