Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

Fast intensity-modulated arc therapy based on 2-step beam segmentationa.

Klaus Bratengeier1, Mark Gainey, Otto A Sauer

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany. bratengeie_k@klinik.uni-wuerzburg.de

Medical Physics
|March 3, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

In-vivo dosimetry using electronic portal imaging in online-adaptive radiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Multicentre patterns-of-care analysis of adjuvant and definitive (chemo)radiotherapy for pharyngeal and laryngeal carcinoma in Franconia, Germany.

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]·2026
Same author

Experimental evaluation of an intraoperative-imaging based workflow for electron beam radiotherapy of pancreatic cancer using in situ dosimetry.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same author

Relevance of the Radon space shadow zone in coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy: studies on head and neck and geometrical targets.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Correction factors and uncertainties in in-vivo point dose measurements.

Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik·2026
Same author

Radiation Therapy Combined with Immunotherapy Before Radical Cystectomy in Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer: A Prospective, Single-arm, Multicenter, Phase 2 Trial (RACE-IT).

European urology oncology·2026
Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Novel intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) techniques show comparable or superior plan quality to existing methods. These advancements in radiation therapy offer faster delivery and adaptive capabilities for improved patient treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Radiotherapy Techniques

Background:

  • Intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) is an emerging radiotherapy technique designed for faster treatment delivery compared to traditional intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
  • The potential for IMAT to adapt to daily variations in target volume shape is a key area of research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the quality of novel IMAT methods designed for rapid delivery and potential daily adaptation.
  • To compare the performance of new IMAT techniques against established methods like step-and-shoot IMRT and commercial VMAT software.

Main Methods:

  • A planning study evaluated novel double and triple IMAT techniques (2-step IMAT) based on geometrical analysis of target and organ at risk (OAR) geometry.
  • These techniques were compared to step-and-shoot IMRT plans optimized with direct machine parameter optimization (DMPO).

More Related Videos

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

  • Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans from preclinical software (SMARTARC) served as an additional benchmark, using four diverse clinical cases.

    • Main Results:

    • The novel 2-step IMAT techniques demonstrated plan quality equal to or better than DMPO.
    • These new IMAT methods were superior to the SMARTARC VMAT techniques.
    • For spine metastasis cases, the composite objective value (COV) difference was 3%; for other cases, 2-step IMAT reduced COV by a factor of 1.4-2.4 compared to reference plans.

    Conclusions:

    • Rotational techniques utilizing geometrical analysis (2-step IMAT) achieve comparable or superior plan quality to DMPO and research VMAT variants.
    • The findings support the development of fast IMAT adaptation strategies based on 2-step IMAT principles.