Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects01:29

Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects

Self-discrepancy theory explains how people compare their actual self to their ideal and ought selves and how mismatches between these self-guides can lead to emotional distress. Developed by E. Tory Higgins, the theory distinguishes among three components of self-concept: the actual self, the ideal self, and the ought self. These refer respectively to how individuals perceive themselves, how they aspire to be, and how they believe they are obligated to be. Emotional well-being, self-esteem,...
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison01:27

Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison

Social comparison plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of personal success and self-worth. Rather than assessing our achievements in isolation, we interpret their significance relative to personal goals and critically in comparison to the performance of others. A grade of B in a mathematics exam might elicit pride if one's expectation was a C, yet result in disappointment if an A was anticipated or if peers achieved superior results. These comparative evaluations illustrate how both...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Benefits of Self-Esteem01:25

Benefits of Self-Esteem

Self-esteem—an individual's overall evaluation of their worth—plays a complex role in psychological functioning and well-being. It is often associated with many positive traits, such as confidence, optimism, and perseverance. Individuals with high self-esteem typically experience better sleep, manage peer pressure more effectively, and report greater life satisfaction. Conversely, low self-esteem has been consistently linked with increased risks of depression, anxiety, and poor academic or...
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Financial scarcity and financial avoidance: an eye-tracking and behavioral experiment.

Psychological research·2024
Same author

Shared and unique features of epistemic emotions: Awe, surprise, curiosity, interest, confusion, and boredom.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2023
Same author

Support for those affected by scientific misconduct is crucial.

Nature human behaviour·2023
Same author

On the physiology of interruption after unexpectedness.

Biological psychology·2021
Same author

Freezing in response to social threat: a replication.

Psychological research·2019
Same author

Surprise: unfolding of facial expressions.

Cognition & emotion·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

When failure feels better than success: Self-salience, self-consistency, and affect.

Marret K Noordewier1, Diederik A Stapel

  • 1Tilburg Centre for Cognition and Communication & Tilburg Institute of Behavioral Economics Research, Tilburg University, The Netherlands. m.k.noordewier@uvt.nl

The British Journal of Social Psychology
|March 3, 2011
PubMed
Summary

People seek predictable, consistent feedback or positive, self-esteem-boosting feedback. Self-knowledge salience dictates which response dominates: consistency-driven when self-knowledge is prominent, and positivity-driven when it is not.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Individuals value feedback for predictability and self-esteem.
  • Self-consistency and positive affirmation are key drivers of feedback preference.
  • The role of self-salience in moderating these preferences is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how self-knowledge salience influences preference for self-consistent versus positive feedback.
  • To differentiate between primary (under load) and controlled responses to feedback based on self-salience.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental design manipulating self-knowledge salience.
  • Assessment of participant responses to both self-consistent and positive feedback under varying cognitive load conditions.
  • Analysis of feedback preferences in relation to self-esteem levels.

Main Results:

  • When self-knowledge is salient, primary responses are consistency-driven, while controlled responses are positivity-driven.
  • Without salient self-knowledge, primary responses become positivity-driven, and controlled responses shift to consistency-driven.
  • Self-esteem moderates consistency-driven responses when self-knowledge is salient.

Conclusions:

  • Self-salience is a critical factor determining whether individuals prioritize feedback consistency or positivity.
  • The interplay between self-knowledge, cognitive load, and feedback type shapes human responses.
  • Understanding these dynamics offers insights into self-perception and decision-making processes.