Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Good Manufacturing Practices01:26

Good Manufacturing Practices

Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) constitute a foundational set of guidelines that ensure the production of safe, consistent, and high-quality products, particularly in industries such as pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and food processing. These protocols encompass all aspects of production, from the sourcing of raw materials to the final distribution of the finished product.A core pillar of GMP is stringent hygiene and sanitation across all production environments. This includes routine...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System01:30

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Selecting medical research data platforms for translational biomedical research: a five-tier overview and requirement-weighted assessment framework.

Frontiers in digital health·2026
Same author

Phosphorylated toll-like receptor 4 defines a high-risk sepsis endotype.

Critical care (London, England)·2026
Same author

AI-Supported, Integrative Prediction of Postoperative Delirium: Protocol for the CONFUSED Study.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Human Cytomegalovirus Serostatus Defines Cytokine-Based Predictive Signatures in Sepsis.

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Loss of Atoh8 Impairs Macroautophagy.

Cells·2025
Same author

AIMing for survival: The impact of the free and total AIM concentration in septic patients.

Frontiers in immunology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes
05:07

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Published on: November 7, 2025

Quality meets quantity - quality control, data standards and repositories.

Martin Eisenacher1, Anke Schnabel, Christian Stephan

  • 1Medizinisches Proteom-Center, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Proteomics
|March 3, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Standardization and quality control are crucial in proteomics. While standard formats and repositories exist, the proteomics community must define minimum quality control documentation and enhance existing standards for robust protein identification and quantification.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes
05:07

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Published on: November 7, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Biotechnology
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Standardization and quality control are increasingly vital in industrial applications like drug discovery and medical product development.
  • The existence of standard data formats and public repositories raises questions about the current state of quality control in academic proteomics.
  • This study examines the role of existing standards and repositories in documenting quality control for protein identification and quantification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the current support for quality control documentation in academic proteomics through standard formats and public repositories.
  • To identify areas for improvement in quality control processes within the proteomics field.
  • To propose future directions for enhancing standardization in proteomics quality control.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and analysis of existing proteomics data standards and public repositories.
  • Assessment of the capabilities of current standards in documenting quality control criteria for protein identification and quantification.
  • Discussion of the requirements for a more substantial and standardized quality control process in proteomics.

Main Results:

  • Existing standard data formats and public repositories offer some support for documenting quality control in protein identification and quantification.
  • There are significant gaps and areas requiring improvement to ensure a comprehensive and standardized quality control process.
  • The Proteomics Standards Initiative and the broader proteomics community have a key role to play in advancing these standards.

Conclusions:

  • The proteomics community needs to establish a minimum set of documentation requirements for quality control.
  • Existing standards must be extended with additional criteria to enable a more robust and standardized quality control process.
  • Enhanced standardization is essential for reliable protein identification and quantification in academic research and industry.