Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Archival Research01:40

Archival Research

Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical significance in nursing research: A discussion and descriptive analysis.

International journal of nursing studies·2017
Same author

Taxonomy of measurement properties: A response to the commentary by Mokkink et al. (2015).

International journal of nursing studies·2015
Same author

Assessing measurement in health: Beyond reliability and validity.

International journal of nursing studies·2015
Same author

Getting serious about test-retest reliability: a critique of retest research and some recommendations.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2014
Same author

Infusion phlebitis assessment measures: a systematic review.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2014
Same author

Is there still gender bias in nursing research? An update.

Research in nursing & health·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

The Use of Trace Eyeblink Classical Conditioning to Assess Hippocampal Dysfunction in a Rat Model of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
19:57

The Use of Trace Eyeblink Classical Conditioning to Assess Hippocampal Dysfunction in a Rat Model of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders

Published on: August 5, 2017

Blinding during the analysis of research data.

Denise F Polit1

  • 1Humanalysis, Inc., 75 Clinton Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, United States. dpolit@rocketmail.com

International Journal of Nursing Studies
|March 4, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Blinding data analysts in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is crucial for reducing bias. Implementing strategies to keep analysts unaware of treatment group status ensures more objective statistical analysis and reliable research findings.

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Transient Optical Clearing Using Absorbing Molecules for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Imaging
07:15

Transient Optical Clearing Using Absorbing Molecules for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Imaging

Published on: July 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

The Use of Trace Eyeblink Classical Conditioning to Assess Hippocampal Dysfunction in a Rat Model of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
19:57

The Use of Trace Eyeblink Classical Conditioning to Assess Hippocampal Dysfunction in a Rat Model of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders

Published on: August 5, 2017

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Transient Optical Clearing Using Absorbing Molecules for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Imaging
07:15

Transient Optical Clearing Using Absorbing Molecules for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Imaging

Published on: July 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Research Integrity

Background:

  • Blinding is essential in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to minimize bias from awareness of treatment allocation.
  • While blinding participants and interventionists is often challenging in nursing RCTs, blinding data analysts is typically feasible.
  • The underutilization of data analyst blinding may stem from misconceptions regarding the objectivity of statistical analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the importance of blinding data analysts in RCTs.
  • To address the underutilization of data analyst blinding in research.
  • To discuss practical strategies for implementing data analyst blinding.

Main Methods:

  • The abstract discusses the concept and necessity of blinding in statistical analysis within RCTs.
  • It highlights the semi-subjective decisions data analysts make during analysis (e.g., missing data, subgroup analyses).
  • The text focuses on the principles and potential methods for achieving analyst blinding.

Main Results:

  • Data analysts' awareness of treatment group status can introduce bias into RCT results.
  • Analyst blinding is achievable in most RCTs, even when participant/interventionist blinding is not.
  • Subjective decisions in statistical analysis necessitate blinding to maintain objectivity.

Conclusions:

  • Blinding data analysts is a critical, yet often overlooked, strategy for enhancing the rigor of RCTs.
  • Implementing analyst blinding helps mitigate bias introduced by subjective statistical decisions.
  • Further discussion and adoption of strategies for data analyst blinding are recommended to improve research quality.