Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experiment-based calibration: Inference and decision-making.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Psychophysiological Outcome Responses in Human Pavlovian Fear Conditioning: A Prediction Error Analysis.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Effects of doxycycline on intrusive experimental trauma memory: a pre-registered, randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

Eye-Tracking-BIDS: the Brain Imaging Data Structure extended to gaze position and pupil data.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Human approach-avoidance conflict behaviour relates to transdiagnostic psychiatric symptom dimensions.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

A systematic review of pharmacological effects on human aversive memory.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

A regret-induced status quo bias.

Antoinette Nicolle1, Stephen M Fleming, Dominik R Bach

  • 1Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom. a.nicolle@fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk

The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience
|March 4, 2011
PubMed
Summary

People tend to stick with the status quo, partly due to regret. This study found that errors rejecting the status quo trigger stronger brain signals, influencing future decisions and reinforcing this bias.

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Decision-making science
  • Cognitive psychology

Background:

  • The status quo bias, a tendency to favor the current state, is a well-documented behavioral phenomenon.
  • While behavioral evidence suggests regret influences this bias, the neural underpinnings remain unclear.
  • Specifically, regret may be asymmetrical, being stronger for rejecting the status quo than accepting it.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural mechanisms driving the status quo bias.
  • To examine if errors in rejecting the status quo have a greater neural impact than errors in accepting it.
  • To link neural activity related to regret and errors to subsequent status quo bias.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to collect brain data from human participants.
  • Participants performed a difficult perceptual decision task with a status quo option.
  • Outcomes (error or correct) were explicitly signaled after each decision.

Main Results:

  • Behaviorally, participants reported higher regret after erroneous status quo rejections compared to erroneous acceptances.
  • fMRI data revealed increased blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signals in the anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex following status quo rejection errors.
  • This pattern of neural activity predicted subsequent acceptance of the status quo option.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that asymmetrical regret, particularly the heightened regret from rejecting the status quo, contributes to the status quo bias.
  • Error-related neural activity in regions like the anterior insula and mPFC may mediate this bias.
  • This study provides a neural basis for understanding how regret influences decision-making and maintains the status quo.