Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phylogenomic discordance and ancestral variation in rapidly radiating felids.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

CAR19 Tregs treat murine chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease through immune suppression in absence of measurable B-cell cytolysis.

JCI insight·2026
Same author

Obesity Promotes Lung Carcinogenesis Through Airway Immune Dysfunction.

Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer·2026
Same author

Phylogenomic blind spots: the limits of UCE and BUSCO loci in the presence of gene flow.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same author

Mutation rate estimate and population genomic analysis reveals decline of koalas prior to human arrival.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same author

From farm to lab: gene-edited sheep transforming bone research.

JBMR plus·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Modified Experimental Conditions for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Mice and Assessment of Hearing Function and Outer Hair Cell Damage
07:13

Modified Experimental Conditions for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Mice and Assessment of Hearing Function and Outer Hair Cell Damage

Published on: February 10, 2023

Effects of training on hearing protector attenuation.

William J Murphy1, Mark R Stephenson, David C Byrne

  • 1National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998, USA. wjm4@cdc.gov

Noise & Health
|March 4, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Training method impacts hearing protection effectiveness. One-on-one training significantly improved A-weighted attenuation compared to written or video instructions for hearing protection devices.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
09:44

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Published on: January 25, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Modified Experimental Conditions for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Mice and Assessment of Hearing Function and Outer Hair Cell Damage
07:13

Modified Experimental Conditions for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Mice and Assessment of Hearing Function and Outer Hair Cell Damage

Published on: February 10, 2023

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
09:44

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Published on: January 25, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Occupational Health
  • Human Factors Engineering

Background:

  • Effective use of hearing protection devices (HPDs) is crucial for preventing noise-induced hearing loss.
  • Training methods can significantly influence the proper fit and performance of HPDs.
  • Varied training modalities exist, including written instructions, video demonstrations, and in-person guidance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of different training instruction methods on the effectiveness of hearing protection devices.
  • To compare the A-weighted attenuation achieved with manufacturer's printed instructions, video training, and one-on-one training.
  • To analyze the noise reduction statistic (NRS A) across different training conditions and subject groups.

Main Methods:

  • Eight groups of naïve subjects were recruited and tested with four different hearing protection devices.
  • Three training conditions were employed: written instructions, video training, and individual (experimenter-led) training.
  • A-weighted attenuation and noise reduction statistics (NRS A) were measured and statistically analyzed.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant difference in A-weighted attenuation was found between written and video training methods.
  • Experimenter-led (individual) training resulted in significantly greater A-weighted attenuation compared to written and video methods for most devices and groups.
  • Differences in NRS A ratings were not statistically significant across subject groups for each protector.

Conclusions:

  • One-on-one training is superior to written or video instructions for maximizing the effectiveness of hearing protection devices.
  • Standardized training protocols, particularly hands-on guidance, are essential for optimal noise reduction.
  • Further research may explore long-term effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses of different training modalities.