Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical judgment and therapeutic decision making.

M A Hlatky1, R M Califf, F E Harrell

  • 1Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Physician decision-making variability impacts medical care quality and cost. Reliable prognosis evaluation, using randomized controlled trials and observational studies, is crucial for improving clinical decision-making knowledge bases.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of obesity on outcome of unrelated cord blood transplant in children with malignant diseases.

Bone marrow transplantation·2010
Same author

Unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation in children with immune deficiency: results of a multicenter study.

Bone marrow transplantation·2009
Same author

Relation between baseline risk and treatment decisions in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: an examination of international practice patterns.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2005
Same author

Penalized maximum likelihood estimation to directly adjust diagnostic and prognostic prediction models for overoptimism: a clinical example.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2004
Same author

Time-based risk assessment after myocardial infarction. Implications for timing of discharge and applications to medical decision-making.

European heart journal·2003
Same author

American College of Cardiology key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee).

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2001

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Clinical decision-making faces scrutiny regarding healthcare costs and quality.
  • Variability in physician decision-making stems from knowledge gaps and diverse problem-solving approaches.
  • Accurate patient prognosis evaluation is vital for effective therapy selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of reliable information in clinical decision-making.
  • To discuss the roles of different study methodologies in evaluating therapeutic principles.
  • To outline future directions for enhancing the knowledge base for clinical decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of the foundational role of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in establishing therapeutic principles.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of the complementary role of observational studies when RCTs are not feasible.
  • Emphasis on the need for rigorous methodology in evaluating patient prognosis.
  • Main Results:

    • Randomized controlled trials offer the most robust evidence for broad therapeutic principles.
    • Observational studies are essential for addressing questions not covered by randomized trials.
    • Methodological rigor is key to generating reliable prognostic information.

    Conclusions:

    • Improving the knowledge base for clinical decision-making requires ongoing research.
    • Future improvements will stem from ongoing randomized studies, meta-analyses, and enhanced data bases.
    • Addressing variability in physician decision-making is critical for healthcare quality and cost-effectiveness.