Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Optimal Arousal Theory01:23

Optimal Arousal Theory

The optimal arousal theory suggests that performance is maximized when an individual experiences a moderate level of arousal. This theory is closely tied to the Yerkes-Dodson law, which illustrates an inverted U-shaped relationship between arousal and performance. The law, formulated by psychologists Robert Yerkes and John Dodson, implies an ideal arousal level for optimal performance, and deviations from this level can lead to declines in effectiveness.
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a bonus...
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning because...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Oculometric signature of switch into awareness? Pupil size predicts sudden insight whereas microsaccades predict problem-solving via analysis.

NeuroImage·2020
Same author

Spatiotemporal Filter for Visual Motion Integration from Pursuit Eye Movements in Humans and Monkeys.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2016
Same author

Development of contrast normalization mechanisms during childhood and adolescence.

Vision research·2016
Same author

Shared sensory estimates for human motion perception and pursuit eye movements.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2015
Same author

Electrophysiological measures of low-level vision reveal spatial processing deficits and hemispheric asymmetry in autism spectrum disorder.

Journal of vision·2014
Same author

Towards an understanding of the roles of visual areas MT and MST in computing speed.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Reward sharpens orientation coding independently of attention.

Stefano Baldassi1, Claudio Simoncini

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Florence Florence, Italy.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|March 4, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Rewarding stimuli enhance performance by improving sensory processing, independent of attention. This study shows reward sharpens orientation discrimination and tuning functions, suggesting early sensory stage modulation.

Keywords:
attentionorientation discriminationreward

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

The Attentional Set Shifting Task: A Measure of Cognitive Flexibility in Mice
09:15

The Attentional Set Shifting Task: A Measure of Cognitive Flexibility in Mice

Published on: February 4, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

The Attentional Set Shifting Task: A Measure of Cognitive Flexibility in Mice
09:15

The Attentional Set Shifting Task: A Measure of Cognitive Flexibility in Mice

Published on: February 4, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Reward is known to improve performance, but the underlying neural mechanisms remain debated.
  • It is unclear if reward effects are mediated by high-level cognitive processes or low-level sensory changes.
  • Previous research suggests primary sensory areas might be involved in reward modulation, but dissociation from attention is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether reward can independently enhance perceptual performance.
  • To determine if reward effects are mediated by low-level sensory mechanisms or high-level cognitive control.
  • To dissociate the effects of reward from attention in perceptual tasks.

Main Methods:

  • A psychophysical dual-task paradigm was employed to control for attentional load.
  • Participants performed orientation discrimination tasks with targets associated with varying reward levels.
  • Performance was measured using orientation discrimination thresholds and behavioral tuning functions.

Main Results:

  • Reward significantly improved orientation discrimination thresholds by approximately 50%.
  • Higher reward rates led to sharpened behavioral tuning functions.
  • These improvements were observed regardless of attentional load or reward cue association.

Conclusions:

  • Reward enhances perceptual performance within a single trial, independent of attention.
  • Reward appears to modulate early sensory stages by improving the signal-to-noise ratio.
  • Findings suggest a direct role for reward in refining sensory processing.