Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

When is a test result abnormal? Defining limits and risks.

J Charrow1, L V Hedges

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill.

American Journal of Diseases of Children (1960)
|February 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reconsidering statistical methods for assessing replication.

Psychological methods·2021
Same author

Triheptanoin treatment in patients with pediatric cardiomyopathy associated with long chain-fatty acid oxidation disorders.

Molecular genetics and metabolism·2016
Same author

Dental abnormalities in Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia.

Journal of dental research·2012
Same author

Fabry disease: baseline medical characteristics of a cohort of 1765 males and females in the Fabry Registry.

Journal of inherited metabolic disease·2007
Same author

The effect of enzyme replacement therapy on bone crisis and bone pain in patients with type 1 Gaucher disease.

Clinical genetics·2007
Same author

Knowledge and attitudes toward a free education and Ashkenazi Jewish carrier testing program.

Journal of genetic counseling·2006
Same journal

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastrointestinal injury in children.

American journal of diseases of children (1960)·1993
Same journal

Picture of the month. Cutaneous leishmaniasis.

American journal of diseases of children (1960)·1993
Same journal

Pathological case of the month. Wells' syndrome.

American journal of diseases of children (1960)·1993
Same journal

Radiological case of the month. Proteus syndrome: benign angiolipomatous tumor with intraspinal extension.

American journal of diseases of children (1960)·1993
Same journal

Applicability of the Greulich and Pyle skeletal age standards to black and white children of today.

American journal of diseases of children (1960)·1993
Same journal

Maltreatment of children born to cocaine-dependent mothers.

American journal of diseases of children (1960)·1993
See all related articles

A new statistical method improves diagnostic certainty by defining normal ranges and reducing misdiagnoses. This approach uses an inconclusive range, crucial for screening programs like Tay-Sachs disease carrier screening.

Area of Science:

  • Medical diagnostics
  • Statistical analysis
  • Genetics screening

Background:

  • Test result overlap between normal and non-normal individuals leads to high misdiagnosis risk.
  • Individuals with borderline results face uncertain diagnoses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a statistical method for quantifying diagnostic certainty.
  • To define an objective normal range for test results.
  • To reduce misdiagnoses in screening programs.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a statistical method to determine diagnostic certainty.
  • Incorporated an inconclusive range to manage borderline results.
  • Defined normal, inconclusive, and non-normal ranges based on misdiagnosis probability, inconclusive frequency, and test reproducibility.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The method provides a quantitative measure of diagnostic certainty.
  • An inconclusive range effectively minimizes incorrect diagnoses from measurement error.
  • Demonstrated application using Tay-Sachs disease carrier screening.

Conclusions:

  • The statistical method enhances diagnostic accuracy in screening programs.
  • Applicable to any continuous variable test results.
  • Reduces misdiagnosis rates by clearly defining diagnostic ranges.