Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Non-Verbal Cues01:29

Non-Verbal Cues

Non-verbal communication extends beyond gestures and facial expressions to include vocal elements known as paralanguage. Paralanguage consists of non-verbal vocal cues such as pitch, loudness, speech rate, pauses, and non-verbal vocalizations like laughter, sighs, and moans. These elements not only accompany speech but also provide critical emotional and contextual information.The Role of Paralanguage in CommunicationParalanguage adds depth to spoken language by conveying emotions and...
Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round end"...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Physical contact reveals a hidden layer of cortical architecture.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Modeling attention and binding in the brain through bidirectional recurrent gating.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Mid-superior temporal sulcus encodes spatial context and behavioral state in freely moving macaques.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A preregistered, open pipeline for early cerebral palsy risk assessment from infant videos.

GigaScience·2026
Same author

Toward a science of prospective learning.

Neuron·2025
Same author

Primate neuroethology: a new synthesis.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Visual-haptic cue integration with spatial and temporal disparity during pointing movements.

Sascha Serwe1, Konrad P Körding, Julia Trommershäuser

  • 1Department of Psychology, Giessen University, Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10F, 35394 Giessen, Germany. sascha.serwe@fernuni-hagen.de

Experimental Brain Research
|March 5, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Humans optimally combine visual and haptic sensory information for motor control, similar to perception. This sensorimotor learning utilizes all available cues, regardless of their timing, for accurate arm movements.

More Related Videos

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Virtual Prism Adaptation Therapy: Protocol for Validation in Healthy Adults
06:12

Virtual Prism Adaptation Therapy: Protocol for Validation in Healthy Adults

Published on: February 12, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Virtual Prism Adaptation Therapy: Protocol for Validation in Healthy Adults
06:12

Virtual Prism Adaptation Therapy: Protocol for Validation in Healthy Adults

Published on: February 12, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Human Motor Control
  • Sensory Integration

Background:

  • Human sensory cue combination is near-optimal in perceptual tasks.
  • Sensory cue integration in motor decisions is less understood.
  • Visual and haptic information are crucial for arm movement control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the integration of visual and haptic cues in sensorimotor control.
  • To determine if temporal cue synchronicity affects multisensory integration during arm movements.
  • To compare sensorimotor cue combination to established perceptual models.

Main Methods:

  • A pointing task was used with human subjects reaching for an invisible target.
  • Noisy visual and haptic cues about target position were provided mid-reach.
  • Pointing accuracy was measured, and performance was compared to a multisensory decision model.

Main Results:

  • Human arm movement control effectively integrates visual and haptic sensory information.
  • Temporal disparity between visual and haptic cue onset did not impact pointing accuracy.
  • Performance aligns with a maximum a posteriori estimation model assuming minimum variance combination.

Conclusions:

  • Sensorimotor learning employs near-optimal cue combination rules, mirroring perceptual processes.
  • The timing of sensory cue presentation is not critical for sensorimotor integration in this task.
  • The brain flexibly utilizes available sensory information for accurate motor control.