Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes02:49

Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes

The free energy change for a reaction that occurs under the standard conditions of 1 bar pressure and at 298 K is called the standard free energy change. Since free energy is a state function, its value depends only on the conditions of the initial and final states of the system. A convenient and common approach to the calculation of free energy changes for physical and chemical reactions is by use of widely available compilations of standard state thermodynamic data. One method involves the...
Free Energy01:21

Free Energy

Free energy—abbreviated as G for the scientist Gibbs who discovered it—is a measurement of useful energy that can be extracted from a reaction to do work. It is the energy in a chemical reaction that is available after entropy is accounted for. Reactions that take in energy are considered endergonic and reactions that release energy are exergonic. Plants carry out endergonic reactions by taking in sunlight and carbon dioxide to produce glucose and oxygen. Animals, in turn, break down the...
Gibbs Free Energy02:39

Gibbs Free Energy

One of the challenges of using the second law of thermodynamics to determine if a process is spontaneous is that it requires measurements of the entropy change for the system and the entropy change for the surroundings. An alternative approach involving a new thermodynamic property defined in terms of system properties only was introduced in the late nineteenth century by American mathematician Josiah Willard Gibbs. This new property is called the Gibbs free energy (G) (or simply the free...
Free Energy and Equilibrium00:55

Free Energy and Equilibrium

The free energy change for a process may be viewed as a measure of its driving force. A negative value for ΔG represents a driving force for the process in the forward direction, while a positive value represents a driving force for the process in the reverse direction. When ΔG is zero, the forward and reverse driving forces are equal, and the process occurs in both directions at the same rate (the system is at equilibrium).
The reaction quotient, Q, is a convenient measure of the status of an...
Free Energy and Equilibrium02:56

Free Energy and Equilibrium

The free energy change for a process may be viewed as a measure of its driving force. A negative value for ΔG represents a driving force for the process in the forward direction, while a positive value represents a driving force for the process in the reverse direction. When ΔGrxn is zero, the forward and reverse driving forces are equal, and the process occurs in both directions at the same rate (the system is at equilibrium).
Recall that Q is the numerical value of the mass action expression...
Free Energy Changes for Nonstandard States03:25

Free Energy Changes for Nonstandard States

The free energy change for a process taking place with reactants and products present under nonstandard conditions (pressures other than 1 bar; concentrations other than 1 M) is related to the standard free energy change according to this equation:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Engineering of acidic pH-responsive anti-CD3 binding antibodies.

mAbs·2026
Same author

Quantifying Spatially Resolved Hydration Thermodynamics Using Grid Inhomogeneous Solvation Theory [Article v1.0].

Living journal of computational molecular science·2026
Same author

Balancing the extremes for antibody developability: hydrophobic and electrostatic germline framework signatures for CDR-loop compensation.

mAbs·2026
Same author

Comprehensive Quantum Chemical Analysis of the Microwave and Infrared Spectra of Cyclopropenone.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2025
Same author

Towards the Use of Metabolic Volatiles in Breath for Determining Drug Response: Gstachamine as an Unlabeled Substrate to Measure CYP3A4 Activity.

ChemMedChem·2025
Same author

Voltage-sensor gating charge interactions bimodally regulate voltage dependence and kinetics of calcium channel activation.

The Journal of general physiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Extracellular Vesicle Tissue Factor Activity Assay
03:53

Extracellular Vesicle Tissue Factor Activity Assay

Published on: December 29, 2023

A challenging system: free energy prediction for factor Xa.

Hannes G Wallnoefer1, Klaus R Liedl, Thomas Fox

  • 1Computational Chemistry, Lead Identification and Optimization Support, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, 88397 Biberach, Germany.

Journal of Computational Chemistry
|March 5, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Molecular dynamics simulations of Factor Xa (fXa) can accurately predict inhibitor binding free energies. Proper system setup is crucial for stable simulations and reliable computational drug discovery targeting thrombosis.

More Related Videos

Unraveling Entropic Rate Acceleration Induced by Solvent Dynamics in Membrane Enzymes
09:42

Unraveling Entropic Rate Acceleration Induced by Solvent Dynamics in Membrane Enzymes

Published on: January 16, 2016

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Extracellular Vesicle Tissue Factor Activity Assay
03:53

Extracellular Vesicle Tissue Factor Activity Assay

Published on: December 29, 2023

Unraveling Entropic Rate Acceleration Induced by Solvent Dynamics in Membrane Enzymes
09:42

Unraveling Entropic Rate Acceleration Induced by Solvent Dynamics in Membrane Enzymes

Published on: January 16, 2016

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Molecular dynamics simulations
  • Drug discovery

Background:

  • Factor Xa (fXa) is a key target for developing antithrombotic drugs.
  • Previous molecular dynamics (MD) studies emphasized the importance of precise system setup for stable fXa simulations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of MD simulations for predicting the binding free energy of fXa inhibitors.
  • To compare different computational methods for free energy calculations in the context of fXa inhibitors.

Main Methods:

  • Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the Factor Xa system.
  • Application of three distinct free energy calculation methods: molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA), molecular mechanics/Generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA), and linear interaction energy (LIE).
  • Validation of computational predictions against experimental data for a set of fXa ligands.

Main Results:

  • Continuum solvent approaches (MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA) required explicit inclusion of some water molecules for satisfactory correlation with experimental binding free energies.
  • The linear interaction energy (LIE) method yielded reasonable predictions when applied to a sufficiently large dataset of fXa ligands.
  • The established protocol for setting up the fXa simulation system proved effective in generating adequate molecular ensembles for reliable free energy calculations.

Conclusions:

  • MD simulations, with careful system setup, are a viable approach for predicting the binding free energies of Factor Xa inhibitors.
  • The choice of free energy calculation method and system setup (e.g., inclusion of explicit water) significantly impacts prediction accuracy.
  • This work validates a computational strategy for accelerating the discovery of novel antithrombotic agents targeting Factor Xa.