Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MRI-guided detection of knee injuries as a concomitant lesion of femoral shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

EFORT open reviews·2026
Same author

Clinical and imaging features of haemochromatosis arthropathy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to inform the development of EULAR classification criteria.

EULAR rheumatology open·2026
Same author

Analysing complex interventions using component network meta-analysis.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Treatment Dose Increase Versus Co-Medication in Allergic Rhinitis: Systematic Review With Dose-Response Network Meta-Analysis.

Allergy·2026
Same author

How to design a ROCI (Response Over Continuous Intervention) randomised trial: guidance and a case study.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

EffectS of Lifestyle Interventions in Older PEople With Obesity (Effective SLOPE): a Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analyses.

Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity·2026
Same journal

When to Adjust for Multiple Testing: A Unifying Guiding Principle.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Ensuring Quality in Preclinical Research: The Importance of Being Human.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Addressing Cluster-Level Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Sample Size Determination for Hierarchical 2 × 2 Factorial Designs.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

A Multiple Imputation Approach to Distinguish Curative From Life-Prolonging Effects in the Presence of Missing Covariates.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Tests for Categorical Data Beyond Pearson: A Distance Covariance and Energy Distance Approach.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Nonparametric Estimation of the Patient-Weighted While-Alive Estimand.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.

Gerta Rücker1, James R Carpenter, Guido Schwarzer

  • 1Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Medical Center, Stefan-Meier-Strasse 26, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany. ruecker@imbi.uni-freiburg.de

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|March 5, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Publication bias in systematic reviews can skew results. Regression-based approaches show promise in addressing small-study effects, outperforming traditional trim-and-fill and Copas selection models in simulations.

More Related Videos

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images (SDM-PSI)
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images (SDM-PSI)

Published on: November 27, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images (SDM-PSI)
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images (SDM-PSI)

Published on: November 27, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Meta-analysis and Biostatistics
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Publication bias and small-study effects pose significant threats to the validity of systematic reviews.
  • Funnel plots are commonly used for graphical diagnosis of small-study effects, but interpreting asymmetry remains challenging.
  • Various statistical methods exist to adjust treatment effect estimates for potential biases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of different methods for adjusting treatment effect estimates in meta-analyses.
  • To evaluate the trim-and-fill method, Copas selection model, and regression-based approaches.
  • To assess the effectiveness of these methods in the presence of publication bias and small-study effects.

Main Methods:

  • The study considers the trim-and-fill method, Copas selection model, and regression-based approaches.
  • Methods were exemplified using a literature meta-analysis with binary response data.
  • A simulation study compared the methods' performance, followed by application to a large set of meta-analyses.

Main Results:

  • Both trim-and-fill and Copas selection models may not fully eliminate bias under strong selection.
  • Regression-based approaches demonstrated to be a promising alternative for bias adjustment.
  • Fundamental differences in underlying assumptions and implementation complexity were discussed.

Conclusions:

  • Regression-based approaches offer a more robust and implementable alternative for addressing small-study effects in meta-analyses.
  • Traditional methods like trim-and-fill and Copas selection models have limitations, especially with significant selection bias.
  • Further research into bias adjustment methods is crucial for enhancing the reliability of systematic reviews.