Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation.

S Yantis1, J Jonides

  • 1Department of Psychology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|February 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Verbal Working Memory Load Affects Regional Brain Activation as Measured by PET.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Spatial versus Object Working Memory: PET Investigations.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Working memory for order and the parietal cortex: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Neuroscience·2006
Same author

Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory.

Neuroscience·2005
Same author

The where and how of attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2004
Same author

PET evidence for multiple strategies of categorization.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2002
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Abrupt visual onsets do not always automatically capture attention, even when observers are highly focused. This study challenges the idea that sudden visual events always override intentional control, proposing a partial automaticity mechanism.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Attention Research

Background:

  • The automatic attentional capture hypothesis posits that abrupt visual onsets involuntarily seize attention.
  • Yantis and Jonides (1984) proposed that sudden visual events inherently capture attention, regardless of observer intent.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically test whether abrupt visual onsets capture attention automatically, even under conditions of focused attention.
  • To investigate the conditions under which attentional capture by abrupt onsets occurs and its relationship to intentional control.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted using a cued visual search task.
  • Participants identified a target letter within an array, where one element had an abrupt onset.
  • Cue effectiveness (duration, predictive validity) was manipulated to assess attentional capture under varying focus levels.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Abrupt visual onsets did not invariably capture attention, contradicting the strong automaticity hypothesis.
  • Attentional capture was not absolute and could be modulated by the observer's attentional state and task demands.
  • Evidence suggests that attentional capture by abrupt onsets is not necessarily in violation of observer intentions.

Conclusions:

  • The findings challenge the notion of fully automatic attentional capture by abrupt visual onsets.
  • A model of partially automatic attentional capture is proposed, integrating voluntary and involuntary control mechanisms.
  • The diagnosticity of intentionality as a criterion for automaticity in attention research is discussed.