Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party
Peter B Cotton1, Glenn Eisen, Joseph Romagnuolo
1Digestive Disease Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425-2900, USA. cottonp@musc.edu
Insights
A new grading system was developed to classify endoscopic procedure complexity. This system aims to complement existing frameworks for adverse events and risk factors in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Medical Procedure Analysis
- Quality Improvement in Healthcare
Background:
- The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Quality Committee has proposed a new lexicon for adverse events and reviewed risk factors.
- Procedure complexity is recognized as a significant factor influencing outcomes in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a standardized system for grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures.
- To create a framework that complements existing ASGE initiatives on adverse events and risk factors.
Main Methods:
- A Delphi-like voting process was used, with participants rating procedure complexity on a scale of 1 (easiest) to 4 (most difficult).
- Community and academic gastroenterologists from the United States, Canada, and Britain participated in the voting.
- Median scores from the votes were used to determine the consensus levels.
Main Results:
- A consensus list was developed, categorizing various endoscopic procedures and contexts into complexity levels 1 through 4.
- This list provides a structured approach to understanding and potentially mitigating risks associated with varying levels of endoscopic difficulty.
Conclusions:
- The developed consensus list offers a foundation for further testing and refinement.
- This system aims to enhance the understanding and management of endoscopic procedure complexity, supporting patient safety and quality care.
Background:
Working parties of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Quality Committee recently published a proposed new lexicon for adverse events and a separate extensive review of risk factors. The complexity of procedures also affects outcomes.
Objective:
To establish a system for grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures.
Design:
Voting on levels 1 (easiest) to 4 (most difficult) on a list of possible procedures and contexts.
Setting:
Community and academic gastroenterologists in the United States, Canada, and Britain.
Main Outcome Measurements:
Median scores of votes cast.
Results:
Consensus list of levels 1 through 4 contexts and procedures.
Limitations:
Eminence rather than evidence based.
Conclusions:
A consensus list was developed for comments and testing to complement the proposed lexicons for adverse events and risk factors.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy
Endoscopic Studies I: Bronchoscopy and Thoracoscopy
Bronchoscopy
Description
Bronchoscopy is a procedure that involves direct visualization of the larynx, trachea, and bronchi for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. A flexible fiber optic or rigid bronchoscope is used to carry out the procedure. The fiber-optic bronchoscope is more frequently used due to...
