Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

List-strength effect: II. Theoretical mechanisms.

R M Shiffrin1, R Ratcliff, S E Clark

  • 1Psychology Department, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|March 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The investigation and management of unilateral nipple discharge.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2020
Same author

Neutral Hydrogen Structures Trace Dust Polarization Angle: Implications for Cosmic Microwave Background Foregrounds.

Physical review letters·2015
Same author

Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions.

Annual review of psychology·2015
Same author

Enhanced collisionless shock formation in a magnetized plasma containing a density gradient.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2014
Same author

Use of the surgical Apgar score to guide postoperative care.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2014
Same author

A Contralateral Complication of Extra-peritoneal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Journal of surgical case reports·2014
Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

The list-strength effect impacts memory differently across recall tasks. Current models struggle, but a modified SAM model with differentiation shows promise in explaining these memory findings.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Research
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • The list-strength effect describes how memory for some items changes based on the strength of other items in a list.
  • Previous research indicated varied list-strength effects across different memory tasks like recognition and recall.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the ability of current computational models to predict observed list-strength effects.
  • To identify cognitive models capable of explaining the nuances of the list-strength effect across various memory retrieval paradigms.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing computational models against empirical data on the list-strength effect.
  • Testing a modified Search of Associative Memory (SAM) model incorporating a differentiation hypothesis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluating variants of MINERVA 2 and other composite/network models.

    • Main Results:

    • Many current memory models failed to accurately predict the observed list-strength effects across recognition, cued recall, and free recall.
    • A modified SAM model, with a differentiation hypothesis, successfully accounted for the data.
    • MINERVA 2 variants showed partial success, while composite and network models did not yield successful variants.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings highlight limitations in existing computational models of memory.
    • A differentiation hypothesis within models like SAM is crucial for explaining the list-strength effect.
    • Future memory model development should consider these constraints for improved predictive power.