Impact of collateral damage to endourologic tools during laser lithotripsy--in vitro comparison of three different clinical laser systems
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026
Photoselective Vaporesection of the Prostate via an End-firing Lithium Triborate Crystal Laser
Published on: May 9, 2018
Markus J Bader1, Christian Gratzke, Volkmar Hecht
1Department of Urology, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. markus.bader@med.uni-muenchen.de
Background And Purpose:
During laser lithotripsy, working instruments are often in close proximity to the distal fiber tip and may be damaged accidentally or even intentionally. The aim of this study was to compare the amount of damage to a standard guidewire and the nitinol wires of endourologic retrieval baskets that were affected by three different clinically available laser systems.
Materials And Methods:
The impact of pulsed laser irradiation on a standard hydrophilic guidewire and a retrieval basket were investigated. One infrared (IR) laser system (holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet [Ho:YAG]: λ = 2100 nm) and two laser systems emitting light in the visible (VIS) spectral range (frequency-doubled double-pulse neodymium:YAG [FREDDY]: λ = 532 nm/1064 nm and flashlamp pulsed dye [FLPD]: λ = 598 nm) were used. Experimental parameters were fiber core diameter, laser pulse energy, and distance between the fiber tip and the investigated tool. Damage was evaluated by microscopic investigation and by quantifying the damage size and magnitude by creating laser impact related damage factors.
Results:
After application of one single laser pulse, IR-laser related maximum damage to guidewires occurred, depending on the pulse energy and the fiber core diameter, either in contact mode or in a distance of maximum 2 mm. Maximum VIS-laser related damage occurred in a distance range of 2 to 3 mm. The nitinol wires of the extraction tools could be destroyed completely by IR laser irradiation at pulse energies E(P) > 1200 mJ, depending on the fiber core diameter used. VIS lasers were solely able to set visible damage to guidewires without any disruption of nitinol wires.
Conclusions:
Ho:YAG laser induced damage to endourologic tools is significantly higher compared with the impact of the FREDDY or the FLPD-laser. Because complete disruption of guidewires and stone extraction tools occurred, a safety clearance must be kept between the fiber tip and the endourologic tool during Ho:YAG stone disintegration. If disruption is intended, such as in the case of basket-retrieval problems, it can easily be performed with Ho:YAG irradiation.
