Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modelling discrete states and long-term dynamics in functional brain networks.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)ยท2026
Same author

Big Data and Trustworthy AI for Heart Failure: A Review.

Circulation. Heart failureยท2026
Same author

Canonical Hidden Markov Model Networks for studying M/EEG.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)ยท2026
Same author

Effects of Age on Resting-State Cortical Networks.

Human brain mappingยท2026
Same author

The role of age in the relationship between brain structure and cognition: moderator or confound?

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)ยท2026
Same author

A transformer-based survival model for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure: a multi-cohort study.

NPJ digital medicineยท2026
Same journal

MUST: Multi-style virtual staining with incomplete pairs.

IEEE transactions on medical imagingยท2026
Same journal

BrainCL: Transformer-Based Brain Network Contrastive Learning with Multi-Order Topology and Salience Masking.

IEEE transactions on medical imagingยท2026
Same journal

LLM-enhanced Neuron Segmentation and Reconstruction in Complex Mouse Brain Images.

IEEE transactions on medical imagingยท2026
Same journal

Matrixed-Spectrum Decomposition Accelerated Linear Boltzmann Transport Equation Solver for Fast Scatter Correction in Multi-Spectral CT.

IEEE transactions on medical imagingยท2026
Same journal

The Ritz Adjoint Method for MRI Pulse Design.

IEEE transactions on medical imagingยท2026
Same journal

Physiology-guided Self-supervised Learning for Simultaneous Dual-Tracer PET Separation.

IEEE transactions on medical imagingยท2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Using Gaussian-process regression for meta-analytic neuroimaging inference based on sparse observations.

Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi1, Thomas E Nichols, Stephen M Smith

  • 1FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. reza@fmrib.ox.ac.uk

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
|March 9, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces Gaussian-process regression (GPR) for neuroimaging meta-analysis, improving upon coordinate-based methods. GPR accurately estimates effect sizes and brain activation patterns, outperforming traditional techniques.

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Coordinate-based meta-analysis (CBMA) is a common neuroimaging technique.
  • Current CBMA methods use limited data (peak coordinates) and have limitations.
  • Existing methods cannot incorporate deactivation data or account for effect size.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an improved meta-analysis technique for neuroimaging data.
  • To address limitations of current coordinate-based meta-analysis methods.
  • To estimate effect sizes at each voxel, which is not possible with existing CBMA.

Main Methods:

  • Gaussian-process regression (GPR) was employed for meta-analysis.
  • The model estimates unobserved statistic images from sparse peak activation data (coordinates and effect sizes).
  • GPR explicitly models spatial uncertainty and effect size.

Main Results:

  • GPR outperforms existing coordinate-based meta-analysis techniques.
  • The GPR model accurately reproduces full-image analysis results.
  • GPR enables the estimation of effect size at each voxel.

Conclusions:

  • Gaussian-process regression offers a more accurate and comprehensive approach to neuroimaging meta-analysis.
  • This method overcomes key limitations of traditional CBMA.
  • GPR provides a powerful tool for localizing brain regions and estimating effect sizes.