Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
When goal sharing produces support that is not caring.
Heather Barry Kappes1, Patrick E Shrout
1New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA. heather.barry@nyu.edu
Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|March 9, 2011
Summary
Setting personal goals for a partner's success can backfire, leading to unhelpful support and hindering the partner's own achievement. This research explores the impact of partner-achievement goals on relationship dynamics and individual outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Relationship Science
- Motivation Psychology
Background:
- Personal goals often focus on self-improvement.
- The impact of goals directed towards a partner's success is less understood.
- Understanding relationship dynamics is crucial for effective support.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of "partner-achievement goals" on support provision and recipient achievement.
- To examine how recipient expectations and effort mediate the influence of partner-achievement goals.
- To highlight the behavioral consequences for both individuals in a relationship.
Main Methods:
- Employed experimental and correlational research designs across four studies.
- Investigated support dynamics in contexts such as computer game performance and dieting.
- Measured recipient expectations of success and effort.
Main Results:
- Partner-achievement goals resulted in unhelpful support provision (Study 1).
- These goals predicted poorer achievement outcomes for recipients (Study 2).
- Effects were moderated by recipient expectations and mediated by recipient effort, with low expectations leading to reduced effort and requests for no support (Studies 3 & 4).
Conclusions:
- Partner-achievement goals can have detrimental effects on support quality and recipient performance.
- Recipient's self-efficacy beliefs play a critical role in moderating these effects.
- The findings underscore the complex interpersonal dynamics influenced by partner-focused goals.
Related Concept Videos
Social Loafing
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
Self-Serving Bias
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
Egoism and Altruism
Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
Self-Help Support Groups
Self-help support groups are voluntary, community-based organizations that provide a platform for individuals with shared concerns to exchange support, insights, and practical strategies for coping with life challenges. Typically led by group members or paraprofessionals, these groups form a cornerstone of mental health care, especially in reaching populations that are underserved by traditional healthcare systems.
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
In- and Out-Groups
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
