Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal Evolution of Color Representations Measured with Magnetoencephalography Reveals a "Coarse to Fine" Dynamic.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same author

Monocular eye-cueing shifts eye balance in amblyopia.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

Enhanced luminance sensitivity on color and luminance pedestals: Threshold measurements and a model of parvocellular luminance processing.

Journal of vision·2024
Same author

Achromatic and chromatic perceived contrast are reduced in the visual periphery.

Journal of vision·2022
Same author

Magnetoencephalography contrast adaptation reflects perceptual adaptation.

Journal of vision·2022
Same author

Linking perceived to physical contrast: Comparing results from discrimination and difference-scaling experiments.

Journal of vision·2022
Same journal

AI-generated faces are becoming more trustworthy.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Attenuated boundary extension in observer perspective memory compared to field perspective memory.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Comparing masking and habituation roles in saccadic omission of stimuli optimized for intra-saccadic vision.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Evidence that global processing does not limit thresholds for RF shape discrimination.

Kathy T Mullen1, William H A Beaudot, Iliya V Ivanov

  • 1McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada. kathy.mullen@mcgill.ca

Journal of Vision
|March 10, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Shape discrimination thresholds rely on individual pattern components, not global integration. This suggests early visual processing stages, not later global ones, determine shape perception limits.

More Related Videos

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI
06:02

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Published on: February 3, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI
06:02

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Published on: February 3, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Computational neuroscience
  • Human psychophysics

Background:

  • Shape processing involves distinct global and local stages.
  • Understanding the limits of early visual processing is key.
  • Radial frequency (RF) patterns are used to study shape perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if shape discrimination thresholds for RF patterns are limited by global processing stages.
  • To investigate the role of individual components versus integrated features in shape discrimination.
  • To explore the influence of chromatic versus achromatic stimuli on shape perception.

Main Methods:

  • Used achromatic and chromatic RF patterns with varying contour thicknesses.
  • Tested discrimination performance using single RF cycles versus complete patterns.
  • Compared RF pattern discrimination with modulated line stimuli.
  • Calculated intrinsic orientation variation at threshold.

Main Results:

  • Shape discrimination thresholds were invariant with the number of RF cycles.
  • Performance with a single RF cycle matched that of the complete pattern.
  • Thresholds for RF patterns and line stimuli were similar.
  • Orientation variation metric correlated with improved discrimination at higher frequencies.
  • Chromatic patterns showed higher thresholds than achromatic ones.

Conclusions:

  • Shape discrimination at threshold appears supported by information in individual components, not global processing.
  • Global shape processing stages may be more relevant for suprathreshold stimuli.
  • Color vision's poorer orientation discrimination might explain chromatic pattern deficits.
  • Findings challenge the notion that global stages limit shape discrimination at threshold.