Crossed cerebellar diaschisis after stroke: can perfusion-weighted MRI show functional inactivation?

Vince I Madai1, Andreas Altaner, Katharina L Stengl

  • 1Department of Neurology and Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.

Insights

Perfusion-weighted MRI (PW-MRI) is not suitable for detecting crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) after stroke. Positron emission tomography (PET) remains the preferred imaging method for assessing this condition.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) is a condition that can occur after a stroke.
  • Accurate detection of CCD is crucial for understanding stroke-related neurological deficits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (PW-MRI) in detecting crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) following stroke.
  • To compare PW-MRI performance against 15O-water-PET, a standard imaging technique.

Main Methods:

  • Both PW-MRI and 15O-water-PET were performed on patients with acute and subacute hemispheric stroke.
  • An asymmetry index (AI) was calculated using regions of interest in the cerebellum for PET-cerebral blood flow (CBF) and MRI-derived maps (CBF, CBV, MTT, TTP).
  • Bland-Altman plots and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to compare the methods and assess CCD detection.

Main Results:

  • Bland-Altman plots indicated that PW-MRI maps could not reliably reflect the degree of CCD.
  • ROC analysis showed poor performance for PW-CBF (accuracy 0.61) and even lower accuracy for CBV, MTT, and TTP (accuracy <0.60) in detecting CCD.
  • These findings suggest PW-MRI is not well-suited for depicting CCD.

Conclusions:

  • Perfusion-weighted MRI at 1.5 Tesla is not adequate for depicting crossed cerebellar diaschisis after stroke.
  • Positron emission tomography (PET) remains a more reliable method for assessing CCD in stroke patients.

Related Concept Videos