Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...

Distance Measurements by Taping

Distance Measurements by Taping

Tapes are essential in surveying for accurate, durable, and short-distance measurements. Made from lightweight, nylon-coated steel, they offer flexibility and strength for rugged outdoor use. The nylon coating protects against rust and wear, extending the tape's life. Standard lengths, around 30 meters, are marked in meters and millimeters for precision.Surveyors select tapes based on site conditions and accuracy needs. Lightweight, nylon-coated tapes are commonly used for ease of handling and...

Distance Corrections

Distance Corrections

To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...

Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions

Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions

When measuring distances in areas with physical obstructions, such as a lake in a field, surveyors must employ techniques to calculate accurate lengths without direct line measurements. One effective method is the offset technique, which allows for precise distance estimation over inaccessible stretches.In this scenario, a surveyor must measure a side of an area that crosses a lake. Since the measuring tape cannot span the lake, the surveyor begins by establishing a baseline that aligns with...

Rules for Significant Figures

Rules for Significant Figures

In any measurement, the precision of the measuring tool is an essential factor. An ordinary ruler, for example, can measure length to the closest millimeter; a caliper, on the other hand, can measure length to the nearest 0.01 mm. As a result, the caliper is a more precise measurement tool because it can measure extremely minute changes in length. The measurements will be more accurate if the measuring tool is more precise.
It should be emphasized that when we represent measured values, the...

Errors in Taping

Errors in Taping

Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Orchestrating gameplay in Dutch physical education: how and why teachers regulate task difficulty.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2026

Same author

Detecting gaze shifts of moving observers in dynamic environments.

Behavior research methods·2026

Same author

Perceptual grouping can affect the online control of goal-directed hand movements.

Experimental brain research·2026

Same author

Evaluating lawful relationships in saccadic eye movements with simulated vision impairment: A proof-of-concept study.

Journal of vision·2026

Same author

Intercepting moving targets: does the visuomotor latency depend on whether one taps on the target or slides through it?

Experimental brain research·2026

Same author

Enforcing a high success percentage interferes with reward-based motor learning.

Scientific reports·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

Using a stick does not necessarily alter judged distances or reachability.

Denise D J de Grave¹, Eli Brenner, Jeroen B J Smeets

¹Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Denise-de.Grave@unilever.com

|March 11, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Using a tool like a stick to touch an object does not change how close people perceive it to be. This study found no difference in distance perception when using a hand versus a stick.

More Related Videos

The Structure of Skilled Forelimb Reaching in the Rat: A Movement Rating Scale

The Structure of Skilled Forelimb Reaching in the Rat: A Movement Rating Scale

Published on: August 8, 2008

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

The Structure of Skilled Forelimb Reaching in the Rat: A Movement Rating Scale

The Structure of Skilled Forelimb Reaching in the Rat: A Movement Rating Scale

Published on: August 8, 2008

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

Area of Science:

Cognitive psychology
Perception science
Human-computer interaction

Background:

Previous research suggests tools can alter distance perception.
Objects touched with a stick are sometimes judged as closer than those touched by hand.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the reasons behind altered distance perception when using tools.
To determine if tool use, specifically with a stick, affects perceived object proximity.

Main Methods:

Six participants estimated object distances verbally or by touching remembered locations.
Object interaction involved either direct hand contact or using a stick.
Distance judgments were recorded in centimeters or reachability terms.

Main Results:

No significant differences were observed in verbal distance judgments between hand and stick conditions.
Touching responses did not differ significantly based on whether a hand or a stick was used.
Perceived object distance remained consistent regardless of the touching implement.

Conclusions:

The hypothesis that tool use alters distance perception was not supported in this study.
Using a stick to interact with an object does not necessarily change perceived distances or reachability.
Further research may be needed to understand the conditions under which tool use influences spatial perception.