Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Variability: Analysis

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...

Two-Way ANOVA

Two-Way ANOVA

The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the means for...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Amino acid composition of human and animal milk, bovine colostrum, and infant formula: a standardized comparative analysis.

Journal of dairy science·2026

Same author

Evaluating a co-developed pet robot intervention and implementation for residents with dementia in long-term care.

Frontiers in dementia·2026

Same author

Retention in trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis of studies reporting participant reasons for trial non-completion.

BMJ open·2026

Same author

Influences on recruitment and retention to mental health randomized controlled trials from the perspective of trial staff: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same author

Planning retention strategies in clinical trials-a qualitative interview study with members of trial teams.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2025

Same author

Retrospective use of the Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 trial design tool to assess design choices in randomized controlled trials: an empirical review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

Operator- and software-related post-experimental variability and source of error in 2-DE analysis.

Renato Millioni¹, Lucia Puricelli, Stefano Sbrignadello

¹Division of Metabolism, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Padua, via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy. millionirenato@gmail.com

|March 12, 2011

Summary

Two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) is a widely used proteomics technique. This review highlights how post-experimental variability, often neglected, significantly impacts 2-DE results, offering solutions for improved accuracy.

More Related Videos

Calibration-free In Vitro Quantification of Protein Homo-oligomerization Using Commercial Instrumentation and Free, Open Source Brightness Analysis Software

Calibration-free In Vitro Quantification of Protein Homo-oligomerization Using Commercial Instrumentation and Free, Open Source Brightness Analysis Software

Published on: July 17, 2018

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

Calibration-free In Vitro Quantification of Protein Homo-oligomerization Using Commercial Instrumentation and Free, Open Source Brightness Analysis Software

Calibration-free In Vitro Quantification of Protein Homo-oligomerization Using Commercial Instrumentation and Free, Open Source Brightness Analysis Software

Published on: July 17, 2018

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

Area of Science:

Proteomics
Biochemistry
Analytical Chemistry

Background:

Two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) remains a cornerstone technique in proteomics for protein separation and differential abundance analysis.
Despite advancements in newer methods, 2-DE retains significant potential for refinement and widespread application.
Variability in 2-DE encompasses biological, experimental, and post-experimental factors, with the latter often overlooked.

Purpose of the Study:

To address the largely neglected aspect of post-experimental variability in 2-DE.
To dissect post-experimental errors into software-dependent and operator-dependent sources.
To provide actionable strategies for minimizing errors and enhancing the reliability of 2-DE results.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature on 2-DE variability.
Categorization of post-experimental errors.
Analysis of software and operator influences on 2-DE outcomes.

Main Results:

Post-experimental variability constitutes a substantial, yet often underestimated, source of error in 2-DE.
Errors can be systematically attributed to either software algorithms or operator actions.
Specific recommendations are proposed to mitigate these identified sources of variability.

Conclusions:

Reducing post-experimental variability is crucial for improving the overall quality and reproducibility of 2-DE data.
Addressing both software-related and operator-dependent factors can lead to more accurate protein abundance analysis.
Further research and standardization in post-experimental procedures are warranted to maximize the utility of 2-DE in proteomics.