Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
Volume-based trends in surgical care of patients with oropharyngeal cancer
Christine G Gourin1, Arlene A Forastiere, Giuseppe Sanguineti
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA. cgourin1@jhmi.edu
Objective:
Positive volume-outcome relationships exist for diseases treated with technically complex surgery. Contemporary patterns of oropharyngeal cancer surgery by hospital and surgeon volume are poorly defined.
Methods:
The Maryland Health Service Cost Review Commission database was queried for hospital and surgeon oropharyngeal cancer surgical case volumes from 1990 to 2009.
Results:
Overall, 1,534 oropharyngeal cancer surgeries were performed by 238 surgeons at 41 hospitals. Cases performed by high-volume surgeons increased from 18.9% in 1990 to 1999 to 24.8% in 2000 to 2009 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.5, P = .002), whereas cases performed at high-volume hospitals increased from 35.0% to 41.8% (OR = 1.7, P <.001). High-volume surgeons were significantly associated with university hospitals (OR = 25.9, P < .001) and were more likely to perform partial glossectomy (OR = 1.8, P = .002), total glossectomy (OR = 3.8, P < .001), and neck dissection (OR = 2.3, P < .001). High-volume hospitals were significantly associated with tonsillectomy (OR = 3.0, P < .001), partial glossectomy (OR = 1.4, P = .044), total glossectomy (OR = 4.3, P < .001), neck dissection (OR = 3.1, P < .001), flap reconstruction (OR = 1.9, P = .028), and prior radiation (OR = 5.0, P < .001). After controlling for other variables, oropharyngeal cancer surgery in 2000 to 2009 was associated with increased utilization of university hospitals (OR = 1.7, P < .001), increased mortality risk scores (OR = 3.1, P = .022), prior radiation (OR = 4.9, P = .011), and a decrease in partial glossectomy (OR = 0.5, P < .001), total glossectomy (OR = 0.4, P = .004), pharyngectomy (OR = 0.6, P = .007), and mandibulectomy (OR = 0.6, P = .022) procedures.
Conclusions:
The proportion of oropharyngeal cancer surgery patients treated by high-volume surgeons and hospitals increased significantly from 1990 to 1999 to 2000 to 2009, with a decrease in partial glossectomy, total glossectomy, pharyngectomy, and mandibulectomy procedures. These findings may be due to changing trends in the primary management of oropharyngeal cancer.
Related Concept Videos
Suctioning the Oropharyngeal Airway
After assembling the equipment, the nurse should practice hand hygiene and don appropriate PPE according to infection control guidelines to avoid the...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Cancer Survival Analysis
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...