Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Behavioral Tracking and Neuromast Imaging of Mexican Cavefish
Published on: April 6, 2019
Comparative morphometrics of two populations of giant river catfish (Mystus seenghala) from the Indus river system
Archana Saini1, Anish Dua, Vindhya Mohindra
1Department of Zoology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India Genetic Characterization Division, National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow, India.
Abstract:
Giant river catfish (Mystus seenghala) from the Beas river were compared with a population in the Sutlej river of the Indus river system using 28 morphometric characters. Discriminant analyses and a univariate anova were used to explore these data. Allometric transformation of each measurement was done to eliminate correlations with size. The stepwise discriminant analysis retained nine variables that significantly discriminated the Beas samples from the Sutlej samples. Using these variables, 91.2% (original) and 89.0% (cross validated) of fish were classified into their correct samples. Misclassification was higher for the Sutlej samples (12.5%) than for the Beas samples (6.3%). The results of the discriminant analyses showed that variability in the Beas samples was more homogeneous and provided a more characteristic picture of the group than the Sutlej samples. The univariate ANOVA revealed significant differences between the means of the two populations for 12 of the 28 transformed morphometric measurements.
Related Concept Videos
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons