Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
Spiral correlations in frustrated one-dimensional spin-1/2 Heisenberg J1-J2-J3 ferromagnets
R Zinke1, J Richter, S-L Drechsler
1Institut für Theoretische Physik, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Abstract:
We use the coupled cluster method for infinite chains complemented by exact diagonalization of finite periodic chains to discuss the influence of a third-neighbor exchange J(3) on the ground state of the spin-½ Heisenberg chain with ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor interaction J(1) and frustrating antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor interaction J(2). A third-neighbor exchange J(3) might be relevant to describe the magnetic properties of the quasi-one-dimensional edge-shared cuprates, such as LiVCuO(4) or LiCu(2)O(2). In particular, we calculate the critical point J(2)(c) as a function of J(3), where the ferromagnetic ground state gives way for a ground state with incommensurate spiral correlations. For antiferromagnetic J(3) the ferro-spiral transition is always continuous and the critical values J(2)(c) of the classical and the quantum model coincide. On the other hand, for ferromagnetic J3 is < or approximately equal to -(0.01...0.02)|J1|. the critical value J(2)(c) of the quantum model is smaller than that of the classical model. Moreover, the transition becomes discontinuous, i.e. the model exhibits a quantum tricritical point. We also calculate the height of the jump of the spiral pitch angle at the discontinuous ferro-spiral transition.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ferromagnetism
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

