Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

04:28
Warm Moxibustion and Scraping as a Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapy for Cervical Spondylosis Treatment
Published on: June 27, 2025
Quantitative corpus-based analysis of the chiropractic literature - a pilot study
Neil Millar1, Brian S Budgell, Alice Kwong
1Department of Linguistics and English Language, University of Lancaster.
The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association
|March 16, 2011
Summary
This study analyzed chiropractic literature to find distinctive vocabulary. Surprisingly, core terms like "subluxation" and "adjustment" were less common than expected.
Area of Science:
- Chiropractic research
- Linguistics
- Bibliometrics
Background:
- Understanding the specialized vocabulary of chiropractic literature is crucial for research and communication.
- Previous analyses have not comprehensively identified distinctive terms within the chiropractic academic domain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify frequently occurring and distinctive words and phrases in the Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association.
- To compare chiropractic literature vocabulary against general English to highlight domain-specific terms.
- To assess the readability of peer-reviewed chiropractic publications.
Main Methods:
- Computerized analysis of a large corpus of peer-reviewed articles from the Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association.
- Comparative analysis against a general English text corpus to identify over-represented terms.
- Calculation of readability statistics for the chiropractic literature.
Main Results:
- Nearly 2,500 words were identified as over-represented in the chiropractic literature, suggesting specialized importance.
- Readability of chiropractic literature is comparable to nursing, public health, and midwifery texts.
- Key professional terms such as "subluxation" and "adjustment" were not found to be highly prevalent.
Conclusions:
- The study identified a unique lexical profile for chiropractic literature, distinct from general English.
- The readability level indicates accessibility comparable to related health professions.
- The lower prevalence of certain expected terms warrants further investigation into professional communication and terminology.
