Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Permeability of Concrete01:25

Permeability of Concrete

Permeability in the context of concrete refers to how easily liquids or gases can pass through the material. This quality is crucial for assessing the water-tightness and durability of concrete structures and their resistance to chemical attacks. Concrete permeability can be determined through comparative laboratory tests. These tests typically involve sealing a concrete specimen from the sides, applying water pressure to the top surface with pressure, and measuring the amount of water passing...
Porosity and Absorption of Aggregate01:20

Porosity and Absorption of Aggregate

Aggregates contain pores of varying sizes; while some are completely enclosed within the particles, others open onto the surface, allowing water to penetrate. The porosity of aggregates is a major factor contributing to the overall porosity of concrete, given that aggregates constitute about three-quarters of concrete's volume.
When all pores in an aggregate are filled with water, the aggregate is considered saturated and surface-dry. If left in dry air, water will evaporate until the aggregate...
Theories of Dissolution: The Danckwerts' Model and Interfacial Barrier Model01:09

Theories of Dissolution: The Danckwerts' Model and Interfacial Barrier Model

Various dissolution theories provide insight into the factors that influence the dissolution rate. Danckwerts' Model suggests that turbulence, rather than a stagnant layer, characterizes the dissolution medium at the solid-liquid interface. In this model, the agitated solvent contains macroscopic packets that move to the interface via eddy currents, facilitating the absorption and delivery of the drug to the bulk solution. The regular replenishment of solvent packets maintains the concentration...
Pore Size Distribution01:23

Pore Size Distribution

In concrete, the pore size distribution significantly influences the material's properties. Capillary pores, markedly larger than gel pores, form a vast network within partially hydrated cement paste, reducing the concrete's strength and increasing its permeability. This heightened permeability leads to a greater risk of damage from environmental factors like freeze-thaw cycles and chemical attacks, with the extent of vulnerability also being tied to the water-to-cement ratio.
Adequate...
Theories of Dissolution: Diffusion Layer Model01:15

Theories of Dissolution: Diffusion Layer Model

Dissolution, the process by which drug particles dissolve in a solvent, is explained by the diffusion layer model, a theoretical framework that simulates the absorption of oral drugs and allows us to analyze experimental data.
This process starts with a thin layer, saturated with the drug, forming at the interface between the solid and liquid. The solute then diffuses from this layer into the main solution. The Noyes-Whitney equation suggests that the rate of dissolution relies on the diffusion...
Factors Affecting Dissolution: Particle Size and Effective Surface Area01:23

Factors Affecting Dissolution: Particle Size and Effective Surface Area

Dissolution kinetics, an essential aspect of oral drug delivery, is significantly influenced by the drug's particle size. According to the Noyes-Whitney dissolution model, the dissolution rate correlates directly with the drug's surface area. The larger the surface area, the higher the drug's solubility in water, leading to a faster drug dissolution rate. Reducing particle size increases the effective surface area, enhancing the dissolution process. Micronization and nanosizing are employed to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diffusion and Adsorption of 2‑Methylpentane and 3‑Methylpentane in MFI-Type Zeolite Crystals.

The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces·2026
Same author

Practical Equivalence Despite Statistical Differences: A Noninferiority Analysis of Repeated Countermovement Jump Series for Within-Session Performance Monitoring.

International journal of sports physiology and performance·2025
Same author

Directing the Mobility of Guest Molecules in Nanoporous Materials by Linearly Polarized Light.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Kinetic selectivity in metal-organic framework chemical sensors.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Pain without gain? A randomized crossover study on the impact of active and passive foam rolling on jump height and pain intensity.

PeerJ·2025
Same author

Dirac-cone induced metallic conductivity in Cu<sub>3</sub>(HHTP)<sub>2</sub>: high-quality MOF thin films fabricated <i>via</i> ML-driven robotic synthesis.

Materials horizons·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Surface Properties of Synthesized Nanoporous Carbon and Silica Matrices
09:31

Surface Properties of Synthesized Nanoporous Carbon and Silica Matrices

Published on: March 27, 2019

Correlating surface permeability with intracrystalline diffusivity in nanoporous solids.

Lars Heinke1, Jörg Kärger

  • 1Faculty of Physics and Geosciences, Department of Interface Physics, University of Leipzig, Germany.

Physical Review Letters
|March 17, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Surface barriers, not just particle diffusion, control how molecules move in nanoporous materials like metal-organic frameworks. A new microkinetic model explains these transport resistances, reconciling different measurement methods.

More Related Videos

In Situ Monitoring of Diffusion of Guest Molecules in Porous Media Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Imaging
06:34

In Situ Monitoring of Diffusion of Guest Molecules in Porous Media Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: September 2, 2016

Monitoring Protein Adsorption with Solid-state Nanopores
08:51

Monitoring Protein Adsorption with Solid-state Nanopores

Published on: December 2, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Surface Properties of Synthesized Nanoporous Carbon and Silica Matrices
09:31

Surface Properties of Synthesized Nanoporous Carbon and Silica Matrices

Published on: March 27, 2019

In Situ Monitoring of Diffusion of Guest Molecules in Porous Media Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Imaging
06:34

In Situ Monitoring of Diffusion of Guest Molecules in Porous Media Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: September 2, 2016

Monitoring Protein Adsorption with Solid-state Nanopores
08:51

Monitoring Protein Adsorption with Solid-state Nanopores

Published on: December 2, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Physical Chemistry

Background:

  • Intraparticle diffusion was often assumed to control guest molecule uptake and release in nanoporous solids.
  • Transport resistances at the external surface, known as surface barriers, can significantly influence or even govern these processes.
  • Discrepancies between macroscopic and microscopic measurements of diffusion are common in these materials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a microkinetic model that incorporates surface barriers and intracrystalline diffusivity.
  • To explain the observed kinetics of short-chain alkanes in the metal-organic framework Zn(tbip).
  • To provide a unified explanation for discrepancies in diffusion measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Correlating surface resistance with intracrystalline diffusivity.
  • Developing a microkinetic model based on experimental data.
  • Studying the transport of short-chain alkanes in Zn(tbip) metal-organic frameworks.

Main Results:

  • The developed microkinetic model accurately reproduces experimental results for alkane diffusion in Zn(tbip).
  • Surface barriers were identified as a critical factor, often more dominant than intraparticle diffusion.
  • The model successfully explains the differences observed between macro and micro kinetic measurements.

Conclusions:

  • Surface barriers play a crucial role in the transport kinetics of guest molecules within nanoporous materials.
  • The proposed microkinetic model offers a generalizable explanation for observed diffusion phenomena.
  • This work highlights the importance of considering external transport resistances in understanding nanoporous material behavior.