Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Application of Simplified Stent-bridging Pancreaticogastrostomy in Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Published on: March 17, 2026
Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children
John E Fortunato1, Carmen Cuffari
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA. jfortuna@wfubmc.edu
Insights
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) offers safe enteral access for children, particularly those with neurological impairment. Laparoscopic gastrostomy shows promise, but further studies are needed to compare its effectiveness against PEG.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gastroenterology
- Minimally Invasive Procedures
Background:
- Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a common, safe procedure for pediatric enteral access.
- Indications include failure to thrive and dysphagia, especially in children with neurological impairment (NI).
- Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in NI patients may require fundoplication before gastrostomy; preoperative pH testing is ineffective for GERD screening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate laparoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion as an alternative to PEG in pediatric patients.
- To compare the outcomes and complication rates of laparoscopic versus PEG procedures.
- To identify the optimal patient population for laparoscopic gastrostomy.
Main Methods:
- Review of outcomes for laparoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion in pediatric patients.
- Comparison of results with existing data on percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) procedures.
- Analysis of complication rates and patient demographics for both techniques.
Main Results:
- Laparoscopic gastrostomy outcomes appear similar to or better than PEG alone.
- The risk of postoperative complications for PEG is generally low.
- Further comparative studies are required to fully elucidate the benefits of laparoscopic gastrostomy.
Conclusions:
- Laparoscopic gastrostomy is a viable alternative for pediatric enteral access.
- More research is needed to establish its superiority and define its ideal patient candidates.
- PEG remains a safe and effective method for enteral access in children.
Abstract:
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a relatively safe and minimally invasive surgical method for providing enteral access in children. In pediatrics, the indications for PEG placement frequently include malnutrition or failure to thrive, as well as oropharyngeal dysphagia, especially in children with neurological impairment (NI). The risk for postoperative complications is low. However, among children with NI, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may necessitate fundoplication prior to gastrostomy tube placement. Preoperative pH probe testing has not been shown to be an effective screening tool prior to PEG placement among patients with GERD. Laparoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion was introduced in pediatric patients in an attempt to decrease complications associated with PEG. Although outcomes were reported to be similar to or better than PEG alone, future comparative studies are needed to better define the optimal patient demographic for this technique.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...