Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Contemporary results for isolated aortic valve surgery
M Gaudino1, A Anselmi, F Glieca
1Division of Cardiac Surgery, Catholic University, Rome, Italy. mgaudino@tiscali.it
Insights
Surgical aortic valve replacement is effective, even for high-risk patients, with low mortality and excellent outcomes. Comprehensive surgical consultation minimizes surgery refusal rates, establishing a benchmark for future techniques.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Cardiac Valve Surgery
Background:
- The contemporary status of aortic valve replacement (AVR) requires an updated overview.
- Aortic valve disease necessitates timely and effective treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an overview of the contemporary status of aortic valve replacement.
- To evaluate the outcomes of surgical AVR in various risk groups.
Main Methods:
- Single-center prospective study initiated in January 2003.
- All patients with aortic valve disease underwent cardiologist and surgeon evaluation for AVR eligibility.
- Operations performed via median sternotomy with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest.
Main Results:
- 873 cases screened; 15 inoperable (1%), 99 high-risk (EuroSCORE ≥ 10), 759 moderate- to low-risk.
- In-hospital mortality: 6.0% (high-risk) vs. 0.3% (moderate- to low-risk).
- Excellent valve function (99.3%) and favorable long-term outcomes (89% NYHA 1-2 at follow-up).
Conclusions:
- Surgical AVR offers excellent results and low operative mortality, even in high-risk patients.
- Universal surgical consultation minimizes surgery refusal rates.
- Study data serves as a benchmark for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) techniques.
Background:
We aimed to give an overview of the contemporary status of aortic valve replacement.
Materials And Methods:
This single-center prospective study was initiated in January 2003. From this date on, every patient with aortic valve disease admitted to our hospital was reviewed by a cardiologist and a surgeon to determine eligibility for replacement. In no instance was the operation denied in the absence of surgical consultation. All operations were performed using a median sternotomy, with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest.
Results:
A total of 873 cases were screened until the end of the study. We identified three groups of patients: Group 1 (inoperable cases) consisted of 15 patients (1 %); Group 2 (high-risk cases) included 99 patients with an additive EuroSCORE ≥ 10 or an expected mortality > 20 % (logistic model); Group 3 (moderate- to low-risk cases) consisted of 759 patients with an additive EuroSCORE < 10 or an expected mortality < 20 %. In-hospital mortality was 6.0 % (6/99) for Group 2 and 0.3 % (3/759) for Group 3. Major complications occurred in 5 patients of Group 2 (5 %) and in 9 patients of Group 3 (1.1 %). At predischarge echocardiography, 99.3 % of the implanted valves were perfect. At a follow-up of 28.9 ± 12.3 months 798/849 patients were alive; 89 % of them (711) were in NYHA 1-2.
Conclusions:
Surgical aortic valve replacement provides excellent results and has a low operative mortality even in high-risk patients. Surgical consultation for every aortic patient resulted in an extremely low rate of surgery refusals. Our data should be regarded as a benchmark for transcatheter techniques.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction

