Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Accounting for group differences in appraisals of social inequality: differential injustice standards
Anca M Miron1, Ruth H Warner, Nyla R Branscombe
1Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, 54901, USA. mirona@uwosh.edu
Abstract:
We tested whether differential appraisals of inequality are a function of the injustice standards used by different groups. A confirmatory standard of injustice is defined as the amount of evidence needed to arrive at the conclusion that injustice has occurred. Consistent with a motivational shifting of standards view, we found that advantaged and disadvantaged group members set different standards of injustice when judging the magnitude of gender (Study 1) and racial (Study 2) wage inequality. In addition, because advantaged and disadvantaged group members formed - based on their differential standards - divergent appraisals of wage inequality, they experienced differential desire to restore inter-group justice. We discuss the implications of promoting low confirmatory standards for changing perceptions of social reality and for motivating justice-restorative behaviour.
Related Concept Videos
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
In- and Out-Groups
Equity Theory
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Impact of Groups on Groups
Self-Discrepancy Theory