Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparable measurement scales in task-comparison experiments.

T O Nelson1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|March 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fluctuations in recall across successive test trials.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Social metacognition: an expansionist review.

Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc·2005
Same author

Consciousness, self-consciousness, and metacognition.

Consciousness and cognition·2000
Same author

Inhalation of 30% nitrous oxide impairs people's learning without impairing people's judgments of what will be remembered.

Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology·1998
Same author

Tradeoff of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: differential effects on metamemory and on long-term retention.

Acta psychologica·1997
Same author

Alterations in the properties of mouse leukemia L1210 cell lines selected by different methods for resistance to deoxyguanosine.

Advances in enzyme regulation·1997

Comparable measurement scales offer quantitative insights for task-comparison experiments, improving data analysis beyond qualitative findings. This enhances understanding of experimental tasks and performance metrics.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Experimental Design
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • The article comments on Schacter, Cooper, and Delaney (1990), focusing on task-comparison experiments.
  • It highlights the importance of measurement scales in psychological research.

Discussion:

  • Comparable metrics enable quantitative comparisons of performance across different tasks.
  • This provides richer data than qualitative conclusions from significance tests on non-comparable scales.
  • Such scales can reveal when fundamentally different types of comparisons are being made.

Key Insights:

  • Utilizing comparable measurement scales in task-comparison experiments offers significant advantages.
  • Quantitative performance comparisons yield more informative results than qualitative analyses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measurement scale comparability is crucial for accurate interpretation of experimental findings.

    • Outlook:

    • Future research should prioritize the development and application of comparable measurement scales.
    • This approach can lead to more robust and nuanced understanding of cognitive processes.
    • Further exploration of scale comparability will refine experimental methodologies in psychology.