Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
Published on: December 11, 2016
Decisions to update comparative drug effectiveness reviews vary based on type of new evidence
Kim Peterson1, Marian S McDonagh, Rongwei Fu
1Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97217, USA.
Objective:
To determine the time to and key factors associated with decision to update comparative effectiveness of reviews of drugs based on periodic scans of new evidence.
Study Design And Setting:
Based on periodic scans of new evidence, we analyzed 69 decisions on whether to update for 41 comparative effectiveness reviews conducted for the Drug Effectiveness Review Project. We used the Kaplan-Meier product limit method to estimate mean time to update and generalized estimating equation logistic regression to estimate associations between updating decisions and review topic or characteristics of new evidence.
Results:
Mean time to update was 24.9 months. Significant predictors of a decision to update were identification of a new drug (odds ratio [OR]: 5.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68-19.44) and the number of new relevant trials (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03-1.10). Compared with nonpsychiatric topics, psychiatric topics were most rapidly developing (mean new relevant citations: 38.4 vs. 8.2; P=0.0127) and were updated at a faster pace (mean survival time: 10.2 vs. 27.5 months; P<0.0001).
Conclusion:
Using periodic scans of new evidence, updating should be considered yearly for rapidly developing topics and biannually for other topics.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Bioequivalence: Overview
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview