Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
Microbial Interactions: Cooperation01:26

Microbial Interactions: Cooperation

Microbial cooperation involves beneficial interactions in which different species work together for individual or mutual advantage. These interactions can profoundly influence ecological dynamics and evolutionary processes, and they are essential to many pathogenic and symbiotic relationships.Nematode–Bacteria CooperationA striking example is the relationship between the Gram-negative bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila and the parasitic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. Juvenile nematodes...
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
Impact of Individuals on Individuals01:30

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AI and the democratization of knowledge work.

Nature computational science·2026
Same author

Integrative experiments identify how punishment affects welfare in public goods games.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

A large-scale evaluation of commonsense knowledge in humans and large language models.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Rethinking news framing with large language models.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Hypothetical nudges provide directional but noisy estimates of real behavior change.

Communications psychology·2025
Same author

Unpacking media bias in the growing divide between cable and network news.

Scientific reports·2025
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments.

Siddharth Suri1, Duncan J Watts

  • 1Microeconomics and Social Systems, Yahoo! Research, New York, New York, United States of America. suri@yahoo-inc.com

Plos One
|March 18, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Network structure did not impact cooperation in public goods games. While individuals acted as conditional cooperators, they responded similarly to both high and low contributions from neighbors, limiting cooperation

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Network Science

Background:

  • Human cooperation is theorized to increase with the density of interactions among conditional cooperators.
  • This suggests cooperation should be more prevalent in clustered social networks (like cliques) than in random networks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of network topology on cooperation in a local public goods game.
  • To determine if network structure reinforces cooperation and if individuals act as conditional cooperators.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted web-based experiments with 113 participants playing a local public goods game.
  • Arranged game interactions on five network topologies, ranging from disconnected cliques to random regular graphs.
  • Introduced artificial seed players exhibiting full or zero contributions to test behavioral responses.

Main Results:

  • Network topology had no significant effect on average contribution levels.
  • Participants generally behaved as conditional cooperators but responded equally to positive and negative neighbor contributions.
  • Positive effects of cooperation were limited to direct network neighbors.

Conclusions:

  • Contrary to theory, network clustering does not appear to enhance cooperation in this public goods game.
  • Conditional cooperation is present but does not lead to reinforcement due to symmetrical responses to neighbors.
  • Cooperation's influence is localized, spreading only to immediate network connections.