Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gauss's Law: Problem-Solving01:10

Gauss's Law: Problem-Solving

Gauss's law helps determine electric fields even though the law is not directly about electric fields but electric flux. In situations with certain symmetries (spherical, cylindrical, or planar) in the charge distribution, the electric field can be deduced based on the knowledge of the electric flux. In these systems, we can find a Gaussian surface S over which the electric field has a constant magnitude. Furthermore, suppose the electric field is parallel (or antiparallel) to the area vector...
Area Computation by the Alternative Coordinate Method01:24

Area Computation by the Alternative Coordinate Method

The alternative coordinate method, also known as the Shoelace Formula, is a technique for determining the area of a traverse using Cartesian coordinates. This method relies on the sequential arrangement of x and y coordinates for each point of the shape, ensuring accuracy and ease of application.In this approach, each corner's x and y coordinates are listed as fractions, with the x-coordinate as the numerator and the y-coordinate as the denominator. These coordinates are arranged sequentially...
Castigliano's Theorem: Problem Solving01:14

Castigliano's Theorem: Problem Solving

The deflection of a simply supported beam that carries a central point load can be analyzed using structural mechanics principles, particularly by applying Castigliano's theorem. This theorem relates the displacement at the load application point to the partial derivatives of the strain energy in the structure. The simply supported beam with a point load at its center has symmetric reaction forces at the supports, each bearing half of the load. The bending moment at any point along the beam is...
Computed Tomography01:10

Computed Tomography

Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Convolution: Math, Graphics, and Discrete Signals01:24

Convolution: Math, Graphics, and Discrete Signals

In any LTI (Linear Time-Invariant) system, the convolution of two signals is denoted using a convolution operator, assuming all initial conditions are zero. The convolution integral can be divided into two parts: the zero-input or natural response and the zero-state or forced response, with t0 indicating the initial time.
To simplify the convolution integral, it is assumed that both the input signal and impulse response are zero for negative time values. The graphical convolution process...
Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving01:16

Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving

Statically indeterminate problems are those where statics alone can not determine the internal forces or reactions. Consider a structure comprising two cylindrical rods made of steel and brass. These rods are joined at point B and restrained by rigid supports at points A and C. Now, the reactions at points A and C and the deflection at point B are to be determined. This rod structure is classified as statically indeterminate as the structure has more supports than are necessary for maintaining...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integration of aggregate data in causally interpretable meta-analysis by inverse weighting.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

IV-learner: learning conditional average treatment effects using instrumental variables.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Variable importance measures for heterogeneous treatment effects.

Biometrics·2025
Same author

Two stage least squares with time-varying instruments: An application to an evaluation of treatment intensification for type-2 diabetes.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same author

Orthogonal prediction of counterfactual outcomes.

Journal of causal inference·2025
Same author

All Lines Is the Right Approach: Selecting Patient Lines of Therapy for an External Comparator Arm.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Invited commentary: G-computation--lost in translation?

Stijn Vansteelandt1, Niels Keiding

  • 1Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, Ghent, Belgium. stijn.vansteelandt@ugent.be

American Journal of Epidemiology
|March 19, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This commentary explains G-computation for causal effect estimation, linking it to established model-based standardization techniques used by epidemiologists for decades. It also introduces doubly robust standardization as a combined approach.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Causal Inference
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • G-computation is presented as a method for estimating causal effects of point exposures.
  • Epidemiologists have utilized model-based standardization for decades.
  • Inverse probability-of-treatment weighting is a commonly used causal inference technique.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the relationship between G-computation and existing standardization methods.
  • To compare G-computation with inverse probability-of-treatment weighting.
  • To propose a novel, combined approach for causal effect estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion and commentary on G-computation and inverse probability-of-treatment weighting.
  • Explanation of model-based standardization.
  • Introduction of doubly robust standardization.

Main Results:

  • G-computation is equivalent to a specific form of model-based standardization.
  • The commentary discusses standardized versus conditional effect measures.
  • Doubly robust standardization is proposed as a compromise approach.

Conclusions:

  • G-computation aligns with long-standing epidemiological standardization techniques.
  • Doubly robust standardization offers a potentially advantageous combination of existing methods.
  • The proposed compromise approach is not more complex to implement.